Kevin Price
The December drop in unemployment: the rest of the story
FacebookTwitter
By Kevin Price
January 11, 2011

Brian Sullivan of the Fox Business Network was in great form recently when he made one of his frequent visits to my show, the Price of Business. I like to think of myself as a consequential thinker. To look at the intent of policy and to fail to size up the results tends to be disastrous. Sullivan tends to think the same way when he talks about the impact public policy has on an economy.

On my program we turned to the subject of the "substantial" drop in unemployment in December of 2010. This was big news to the Obama administration. ABC News reports that "President Obama today called the job numbers released this morning 'positive news' but said there still is work to be done on the economy. The numbers showed a drop in the nation's unemployment rate to 9.4 percent in December." To say there "still is work to be done" is an under statement, since this shows roughly one out of ten still out of work.

I have been speculating the drop in unemployment as reflective of the fact that there was a change in Congress in the elections one month before. Maybe, but Sullivan suggested a different theory both on my show and in his Fox Business column. In his recent column, Sullivan cuts to the chase: "Is the real reason the unemployment rate dropped because jobless benefits stopped?" He quotes Paul Dales of Capital Economics in Canada, stating "it is possible that the fall in the labour force is due to the long-term unemployed being more willing to admit they are not actively looking for work after their extended benefits expired last month. The unemployment rate may rebound in January, particularly after Congress agreed to reinstate those extended benefits." This is a profoundly simple explanation. This is a viewpoint that makes perfect sense, but is not receiving much air time in the mainstream media.

Sullivan goes on to point out some thoughts of Dan Greenhaus, who writes in his morning note that "'structural unemployment' is becoming a huge problem." Greenhaus notes: "Perhaps most troublesome is the data on the long term unemployed. As a percentage of total unemployed persons, people unemployed for six months or more make up a whopping 44%+ of the group and for the month of December, this was the only duration that did not see a drop. Given the argument that the longer one is unemployed the less employable they become, this runs the risk of becoming a real structural problem for the economy."

We are quick to dismiss "old sayings,' simply because they are "old." We keep repeating them, however, because they often reflect truth. One of my favorites is, "The more you tax something, the less you get of it; the more you subsidize something, the more you get of it." Our tax rates on wealth creation have been approaching all time highs. In fact, without the extension of the Bush tax cuts, our rates were about to become the highest of any industrialized country in the world. Meanwhile, we have been subsidizing unemployment at a historically high rate. There were two years of unemployment benefits. These benefits compete against many jobs that were available.

All this suggests that Brian Sullivan's conclusion may be true, that, now that the Congress has restored unemployment benefits, rates may go up again. Why? Because they will be paid, again to be recognized as unemployed. This should provide excellent timing for policy makers to reconsider the way they help those who are chronically unemployed.

© Kevin Price

 

The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)

Click to enlarge

Kevin Price

Kevin Price is Publisher and Editor in Chief of www.USDailyReview.com

His background is eclectic and includes years of experience in both business and public policy, as well as two decades of experience in broadcast journalism. He was an aide to U.S. Senator Gordon Humphrey (R-NH) and later went on to work in policy areas with some of the nation's leading think tanks including the National Center for Public Policy Research and was part of the Heritage Foundation's Annual Guide to Public Policy Experts... (more)

Subscribe

Receive future articles by Kevin Price: Click here

More by this author

 

Stephen Stone
The most egregious lies Evan McMullin and the media have told about Sen. Mike Lee

Siena Hoefling
Protect the Children: Update with VIDEO

Stephen Stone
Flashback: Dems' fake claim that Trump and Utah congressional hopeful Burgess Owens want 'renewed nuclear testing' blows up when examined

Jerry Newcombe
Church should be about worship, not entertainment

Laurie Roth
Trump, the truth, and America will prevail in spite of leftist evil plans

Cliff Kincaid
Terrorist attack in Baltimore

Tom DeWeese
DOJ ignores 2nd Amendment

Linda Goudsmit
CHAPTER 11: Critical Race Theory: A species of the ideological thought genus Marxism

Pete Riehm
They have tried everything to destroy Trump, but assassination

Tom DeWeese
When your red state governor dresses in blue

Rev. Mark H. Creech
Revelation Chapter 22: Eternal recompense

Tom DeWeese
YIMBYs, workforce housing, and community land trusts: All means to an end to private property

Jerry Newcombe
The vice president visits an abortion clinic—and the people yawn?

Pete Riehm
Like our Commander-in-Chief, America is clueless, feckless, and powerless

Selwyn Duke
Did anti-white, DEI bias steal a state final spot from a white basketball team?
  More columns

Cartoons


Click for full cartoon
More cartoons

Columnists

Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Russ J. Alan
Bonnie Alba
Chuck Baldwin
Kevin J. Banet
J. Matt Barber
Fr. Tom Bartolomeo
. . .
[See more]

Sister sites