Paying for our own execution

By Dan Popp

The Muzmurderer of Manchester was paid, fed and educated by the parents of his victims.

Oh, they didn't do it intentionally, no. But their tax dollars went through the "welfare" apparatus of the UK, to the man who then killed their children. But that isn't unusual. The bomber brothers of Boston had been the recipients of the loot of their victims, as well. After any fresh human sacrifice to the "merciful" deity of Islam, you're likely to learn that you (if you're a taxpayer) have been an accessory to mass murder via the "merciful" state religion of Marxist atheism.

There are only three ways to deal with this. We can madly continue to aid and support our own killers; or we could screen recipients of public aid for any tendencies toward muzmurder (cue screams of "religious test!"); or we could end the "welfare" system, so inimical to the actual national welfare.

There's no question what the American sheeple will do: We'll go on feeding and arming the future murderers of concertgoers, office workers, travelers and shoppers. We'll give these anti-humans comfortable dwellings, we'll educate them – perhaps they'll take up something exciting like chemistry or aviation, wouldn't that be swell? – and we'll work to keep them alive for the moment they make a lot of us dead.

This all sounds very rational, doesn't it? Very compassionate, certainly. How could any hard-hearted, hate-filled conservative resist being forced to subsidize any crime against humanity that might occur to a demon-possessed imagination? What, you expect a nail bomber to buy his own nails?!?

Let's demolish the "religious test" canard right here. Article 6 of the Constitution prohibits a religious test for officeholders. "... no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States." It does not prohibit a religious test for foreigners who seek refuge here (indeed, as I understand it, until recently religion has been one of the main criteria for granting asylum). Nor could there possibly be anything in the Constitution banning any restrictions we would like to put on "welfare" – BECAUSE "WELFARE" ITSELF IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents...." – James Madison, Father of the Constitution

So if you want to follow the Constitution, I'm with you all the way. Let's do it.

The war against muzmurderers will not be won with weapons-grade hugs from the pajama-clad armies of transgendered relativists. The Crusades pitted one worldview/religion/god against another. Today's quest for Muslim domination encounters no such resistance, but only the tissue paper of moronic leftist "constructs." One side is screaming "We will slaughter and subjugate all of you," and the other is chanting, "Yay, we celebrate diversity!" #Hugs

Contrast the words of two British leaders only a couple of generations apart: the current (Muslim) mayor of London, who advised citizens to shrug off terrorism as a fact of life in big cities nowadays, versus Winston Churchill facing a different existential threat:

We shall go on to the end. We shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender, and if, which I do not for a moment believe, this island or a large part of it were subjugated and starving, then our Empire beyond the seas, armed and guarded by the British Fleet, would carry on the struggle, until, in God's good time, the New World, with all its power and might, steps forth to the rescue and the liberation of the old.

My God, what happened to us?

© Dan Popp