Bryan Fischer
President Trump can correct 70 years of judicial abuse
By Bryan Fischer
June 26, 2017

Follow me on Twitter: @BryanJFischer, on Facebook at "Focal Point"

Host of "Focal Point" on American Family Radio, 1-3pm CT, M-F

Rumors are circulating widely in Washington, D.C. that Justice Anthony Kennedy may step down from the Supreme Court this summer, possibly even as early as today (Monday). He's 81 and has been on the bench for 30 years.

While those on the left consider him a conservative, he has been an absolute disaster on issues constitutional conservatives care about. For instance, he has been on the wrong side of every single court case that deals with sexual abnormality, beginning with the Romer v. Evans case in 1996, in which Kennedy wrote the opinion that overturned an amendment to the Colorado state constitution that prevented pro-homosexual brainwashing in government-run schools.

That disastrous ruling made every constitutional conservative the functional equivalent of Bull Connor by declaring that opposition to the rabid homosexual agenda was as pernicious as racism. Kennedy's ruling empowered the most radical elements of the homosexual lobby, and it was only a matter of time until the Court ruled in 2015 that marriages based on the act of sodomy must be considered the moral equivalent of natural marriages that follow God's design.

Kennedy was on the wrong side of the Lawrence v. Texas decision of 2003, which demonized any law which makes sodomy contrary to public policy, thus plunging America into a the moral abyss of anything-goes sexuality.

And he was on the wrong side of the Obergefell decision of 2015, which set aside 6000 years of civilization, the word of God, common sense, reason, and the Constitution itself by legitimizing sodomy-based marriage. Such "marriages" are based on an act which Scripture calls an "abomination" (Leviticus 18:22) in the eyes of God and something that is "contrary to nature" (Romans 1:26).

In 1992's Planned Parenthood v. Casey, he voted to protect the butchering of babies by upholding Roe v. Wade. In the process, he uttered these immortally infamous words: "At the heart of liberty is the right to define one's own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life." From a legal and constitutional standpoint, these words are mumbo-jumbo gibberish.

On Friday, in the very latest Supreme Court ruling, Murr v. Wisconsin, Kenney joined the majority to completely eviscerate the 5th Amendment, which was written to protect private property from being seized by the government. In the Murr ruling, he eagerly defended bureaucrats who caused the value of a plot of land to plunge from $400,000 to $40,000, with absolutely no compensation from the government who robbed these helpless folks of a third of a million dollars.

In my view, Anthony Kennedy cannot leave the bench soon enough. We only have Kennedy on the bench because the left torpedoed Robert Bork's nomination to the Court by maliciously defaming and demeaning him. This led President Reagan to meekly replace Bork with Kennedy, who was so squishy that even Democrats weren't afraid to confirm him. And we have paid a catastrophic price as a culture ever since.

But if Kennedy departs, there is simply no reason for President Trump not to nominate a Scalia-type justice to take his place. With the filibuster gone, the Republican-led Senate can add to the bench any judge it wants. There is no reason not to confirm a judge who reveres the Constitution as written and does not treat it as a living, mutating thing that can morph into anything the fevered imagination of the left wants it to be.

Supreme Court jurisprudence took a disastrous left turn back in 1947 with the Everson ruling, which conjured up the previously undetected Incorporation Doctrine out of the judicial ether. After Everson, the Court began using the First Amendment for the first time in our history as a bludgeon to suppress religious liberty rather than protect it at every level in every state in the Union.

Seventy years of this type of misbegotten and skewed jurisprudence is 70 years too many. If Justice Kennedy retires, President Trump will have the opportunity to deliver us from the Babylonian Captivity of the Court and get us back to celebrating rather than trashing the God-given rights our government has a sacred duty to protect. May Justice Kennedy enjoy a long and peaceful retirement, and may it begin immediately if not sooner.

(Unless otherwise noted, the opinions expressed are the author's and do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Family Association or American Family Radio.)

© Bryan Fischer


The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)


Stephen Stone
HAPPY EASTER: A message to all who love our country and want to help save it

Stephen Stone
The most egregious lies Evan McMullin and the media have told about Sen. Mike Lee

Siena Hoefling
Protect the Children: Update with VIDEO

Stephen Stone
FLASHBACK to 2020: Dems' fake claim that Trump and Utah congressional hopeful Burgess Owens want 'renewed nuclear testing' blows up when examined

Robert Meyer
Competing religious claims

Cliff Kincaid
The next assassination attempt

Pete Riehm
America needs unity, but also accountability

Ronald R. Cherry
The Secret Service

Armand C. Hale
Where are my shoes?

Frank Louis
So now what?

Michael Bresciani
Thank God: Donald Trump is alive after assassination attempt

Linda Goudsmit
CHAPTER 27: Pronouns and Pantheism

Curtis Dahlgren
Emphasizing differences: Making a nightmare of the American Dream

Rev. Mark H. Creech
‘No other gods before me’: Seven false gods of the present age (Part 2)

Tom DeWeese
Is home ownership the American dream or an opportunity for government control?

Jerry Newcombe
A tale of two revolutions
  More columns


Click for full cartoon
More cartoons


Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Russ J. Alan
Bonnie Alba
Chuck Baldwin
Kevin J. Banet
J. Matt Barber
Fr. Tom Bartolomeo
. . .
[See more]

Sister sites