Dear Friends and Patriots,

I wish to claim some of your time to explain myself regarding some of the things I've been posting to Facebook and otherwise publishing, lest you get the wrong idea.

I have been posting things that some might view as anti-Muslim, when I am NOT anti-Muslim. A Muslim is a person – a human being like all other human beings. I have no animosity toward any human. That's not what I try to convey.

While I don't harbor animosities toward fellow humans, I do harbor some rather deep animosities toward certain ideologies. I don't care for any ideology that's anti-human, which is why I advocate against communism, Marxism, and socialism in any form. Those ideologies are inconsistent with the best aspects of human nature. They foster an odd sort of greed – the greed of the habitual underachiever who believes they and those like them merit the best of everything, just by virtue of the fact that they live and breathe. They speak in terms of "equity" and never of actual merit.

I admit I have animosities toward any ideology that is purposefully offended by my existence. I find such ideologies to be illogical and motivated by the same kind of underlying emotions that move the underachievers mentioned above. Those are ideologies of exclusion. The First Amendment guarantees all Americans the right to practice their chosen faiths their way, but that's where exclusionary ideologies actually part company with our Constitution. Any ideology that includes a belief that theirs is the only "true way" and all others should either submit to that ideology or cease to exist is not an ideology that should be permitted in our society. Why? Because such beliefs intrinsically reject the Constitutional notion of freedom of religion.

I'm sure there are religious sects other than Islam that are exclusive in their ideology. But, I know of no other religious ideology that believes that all who are not like them are not worthy of life. That is what the Qur'an proposes. It establishes a system of ideology that holds the believers in Allah and "his Prophet" are destined to be the masters of the entire planet, and that to effect that destiny all who are not believers in the Islamic way are either to be converted or killed. Oh, then there's a really "kind" provision that others who reject their way may live on if they pay a specific bribe, the so-called jizya tax, that allows them to live in a second-class state.

Today it's estimated that 6% of our nation's population claims Allah as their god and Muhammad as his prophet. That's 6%, about 21 million in our land who claim a faith that states that I'm not worthy of life. That's 6% in our land who believe Islam is the only way, and that the believers of all other faiths are not worthy of life. That's 6% who adhere to beliefs that are in direct contradiction to the First Amendment guarantees to all faiths.

Does any of this make me anti-Muslim? I say it doesn't, because again, a Muslim is a person, a human being, and I am not an anti-human. I'm not against any person, but I am against any ideology that would consider me to be less than I am.

Islam has goals that were codified in the latter part of the 6th and early part of the 7th Centuries. Those goals have NEVER CHANGED. Some of the methods used to effect those goals have, but the goals themselves are as they were originally – to make Islam the sole religion of the planet and to rule the planet under a single caliphate. All humans alive would either live in obedience to the dictates of that caliphate or pay the jizya and accept life as a permanent second-class citizen. Those are the only conditions allowed under the ancient and present goals of Islam.

There are those who want to split hairs on this whole issue. There are people who speak of "political Islam" and who differentiate between Muslims and Islamists – saying that Muslims are good and Islamists are the people we should consider dangerous – either terrorists or potential terrorists.

I like to think of myself as a rational person. When I spent time a few years ago pondering all the above, reading the Qur'An, reading excerpts from the Hadith, and perusing various religious advice websites published by Muslim imams from all over the world, I finally reached the conclusion that there is nothing about Islam that I want. Not only did I reach that conclusion, but I reached a more fundamental one – the one that guides me even now. The conclusion I reached, which I maintain is perfectly rational, is that any person who swears their allegiance and fidelity to the Qur'an and the ideology it represents is not a person I could ever fully trust. It's truly that simple.

I would never turn my back to anyone who claims to be a faithful Muslim. Why? Because the Qur'an itself warns me never to do such a thing. The Qur'an tells me I could lose my head for doing just that. Does this mean all Muslims are a threat? Absolutely not! Most Muslims are likely not a threat to another living human. So ... why? It’s because all Muslims who want to be considered faithful will say they follow the Qur'an. To me, that means all who swear to the Qur'an are at least potential murderers. If they are people who put their true faith in Islam's ideology, they are subject to its internal rules and edicts. They are all subject to the fatwas issued by imams, fatwas that are endorsed by other imams ... fatwas that could "activate" people into committing murder.

I'm not indulging in hyperbole. The things I suggest are daily occurrences all over the world. Imams issue fatwas against "enemies of Islam" daily. They issue fatwas against those Muslims who leave the faith – apostates. The fatwas essentially give an apostate two options – return to the faith or be marked for death. Any Muslim who kills such a marked apostate is guaranteed a place in their heaven. Any Muslim who dies while accomplishing the terms of a fatwa is considered to be a martyr for Allah, and also guaranteed a place in their heaven, plus a few goodies on the side.

When I first heard Islam described as a "death cult" it hit me as a profound truth. Islam is not a tolerant ideology – it's the absolute example of religious intolerance. Its cult features are in how the imams explain even the most absurd aspect of their faith as acts of love. When a husband beats his wife, that's an act of love – his "corrections" are meant to keep his wife's faith intact. When a father murders his daughter for sneaking out for a date with an infidel, that, too is an act of love. He's reclaiming his tarnished honor and ensuring his daughter's "sin" doesn't contaminate his entire bloodline.

I paid close attention to things when our troops were operating in Afghanistan. I remember when an Army Major was killed by his interpreter in a crowded assembly hall, just before the Major announce an award to the killer for his faithful assistance to our mission there. I also recall learning that in Afghanistan a common fatwa against a faith-traitor, like those interpreters, was to kill each and every member of their families, including any livestock they owned. I learned how the "religion of peace" exercised controls on its adherents.

I also learned that in Pakistan women are still routinely stoned to death for the crime of infidelity. Actually the woman doesn't have to commit such an offense – just be accused of it by any male. In Pakistan the Sharia courts allow for only one witness against any woman, while a women cannot refute any allegation made against her unless she has 5 men to bear witness in her behalf. Even when a woman isn't accused in court, she can be dealt with, with almost total impunity. The favorite method of that kind of unofficial punishment is by tossing a glass of acid in her face. Gee, what a "loving" gesture!

I could go on and recount many more thing that I know are sanctioned in Islam that you might consider horrible, but won't. You don't want to know the things I know.

The Muslims among us – are they just nice, kind, and generous people, or are they a threat? I'll answer that. Many are just that – nice, kind, and generous, and they're a threat. Maybe not a threat now, but they are all subject to being weaponized. If they reject an assignment to carry out a fatwa, they can be legally killed under the Sharia they pledge to. That makes every Muslim at the very least a threat to anyone who doesn't follow Islam, as well as anyone declared to be an apostate.

Let me linger on and discuss a bit about hijra. Hijra is the subjugation of another territory to incorporate it into the body of Muslim territories – to make that territory subject to the rule of the future world caliphate.

A hijra against the entire western world has been underway for over 50 years. I refer to it as "the peaceful hijra" because there's no war or military forces involved. The peaceful hijra is here. It's in our cities and all states. Muslims who would declare they have absolutely no intent to pursue hijra are doing exactly that – solely by their presence.

The leaders of all Islamic nations and all Islamic organizations learned long ago that they cannot defeat western peoples by force. We have stood up to them when they waged war and defeated them time and time again. Mindful of that, and also mindful of the New World Order cabal's parallel intent to dominate the planet, the leaders of Islam have joined hands with the NWO cabal in one common interest – to destroy all of western civilization and subjugate its people.

Naturally that means Muslims must dominate all of the west, and they've been aided and abetted by NWO advocates, such as the United Nations, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Club of Rome, Chatham House, the World Economic Forum, and a host other groups that are aligned in their desire to dominate the planet. It seems odd, but the leaders of Islam understand that if they succeed in their efforts there will be a huge day of reckoning. There can't be two rulers of the earth – the cabal and the Islamic caliphate. There's only room for one, and the leaders of Islam are convinced that Allah has already made that decision.

Okay, so ... I've laid out my case and told you all some of my reasons for many of my posts. I hope you accept that I'm not a "phobe" of any kind. I bear no animosity toward person or living thing. I'm certainly not afraid. I use knowledge to guide me. That knowledge tells me that the people who are going around saying "Islam is incompatible with western philosophy" and "Islam is incompatible with the US Constitution" are 100% correct in every word, syllable and letter.

Bet on it.

In Liberty,

Steve