JR Dieckmann
Obama: authority or authoritarian
By JR Dieckmann
Rarely does a day go by that we don't see the community organizer in front of a camera pretending to be an authority on something. His mindless and childish babbling is really becoming an annoyance.
We generally listen to someone speak because we can learn from their expertise. But listening to Obama speak is like listening to the ramblings of an incoherent idiot. He is an authority on nothing — unless you are interested in what Karl Marx, Saul Alinsky, Frank Marshal Davis, and George Soros have to say.
He professes on fixing the economy and a nonexistent economic recovery as though he knows what he's talking about — he doesn't.
He lectures on foreign policy and says that if we are just nice to our enemies, they will be nice to us, as though he understands how the world works — he doesn't.
He sermonizes on healthcare with false numbers and benefits as though he knows how it will affect the economy and what it will cost the American people — he doesn't.
He displays his naive ignorance on how to achieve world peace through appeasement and nuclear disarmament as though he knows anything about nuclear defense — he doesn't.
He constantly demonizes Wall Street, the free market, and anyone who disagrees with him as being responsible for the problems that he and his liberal led Congress have created, as though he understands how private enterprise and the free market works — he doesn't.
If, in fact, he does understand these things, then we can only conclude that — as many Americans believe — he is pursuing this destructive agenda with the intent of destroying the American free economy to replace it with a Marxist system of socialism. Either way, it shows him to be the enemy of the American people and the nation's Founders, and unfit to hold the office of President of the United States of America. He must be removed while we still have the capacity to do so.
Why should we listen to this flim-flam man, an authority on nothing with his own liberal utopian illusions about our country and the world; a man who claims to have been a constitutional professor, when in reality, he has no understanding of, or respect for, the Constitution? His lectures were not so much on constitutional law as they were on his own anti-constitutional views.
Why should we listen to a man who has failed at nearly everything he has attempted in his life except for campaigning on the false promise of "hope and change?" He promised hope for change in Washington politics with openness and transparency, but what he is delivering is more of the same in Washington while changing the American free society into something else. That is not the kind of change promised in his campaign.
He wasn't even much good at community organizing as is evidenced by his failed program with the Chicago Annenberg Foundation. Even his brief attempt with Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland law firm as a civil rights attorney didn't work out for long. He had no accomplishment of his own and the résumé of a career drifter before entering politics.
He slipped into the Illinois Senate by using Marxist smear tactics to force his opponents out of the race and thus won the election by default. He did the same again to ride into the U.S. Senate on a campaign powered by Chicago Marxists thugs and a socialist Democrat party. That was, of course, without acknowledging his association with, and endorsement by, the communist New Party in the 1990s.
He voted "present" 129 times in Illinois State Senate before running for the U.S. Senate. After his election by default, he served for 18 months before heading back to the campaign trail to run for president - with all of his birth and vital records sealed from public view. He has, so far, spent over a million dollars in legal fees to keep them concealed.
Why should we listen to anything this empty suit has to say? It's always the same socialist rhetoric he learned from Alinsky and Marx, but often punctuated with conservative sounding verses that completely contradict his intent. For example, he touts the opening of limited offshore oil exploration as a crumb thrown to Republicans for the passage of his upcoming energy bill. He knows that no drilling and pumping of oil will result from this for a number of reasons.
For one, "exploration" is not drilling. We don't need more exploration; we already know where the oil is. We need to drill and pump it out. For another, no matter what he says or approves, he knows that the EPA and its partners in crime, the environmental whackos will use regulations and the courts to prevent us from making use of our own natural resources.
He even brought nuclear power plants into the mix as another crumb to be feasted on by Republicans. But those few power plants he talked about have already been approved by the government, but are tied up in the courts by the same whackos and tree huggers who think modern electricity should be produced by windmills and solar panels, but without the use of transmission lines, which they consider an eyesore.
He has nothing original to say, yet after every remark, we keep hearing the same recorded applause sound track day after day as though there is really a crowd of supporters listening to and cheering for every worthless sentence. Just listen to one of his speeches and you'll hear the same sound track every time, the same voices cheering and screaming at every meaningless utterance. Just like a TV sitcom, this man is scripted and just as boring to watch, sound effects and all.
Never before in history have the American people felt as threatened by their government as they do today. This looks an awful lot like communism. By that, I do not mean Soviet Russian communism, but American communism that has its roots in early 20th century progressivism. Although the American progressive movement got its inspiration, and had lose ties with Soviet communism, it now seems more of a cradle to grave, government dependence and rule agenda that bears a striking resemblance to Russian communism.
When big centralized government dominates a forced, left-of-socialist society, you have communism. When this same government attempts to take control of the free market economy, you have communism. This is what people fear our country is becoming since the election of Barack Obama. One needs only look at the healthcare bill to see that this is true.
Why does the healthcare bill mandate a government takeover of student loans? Doesn't that give control to the Obama regime over who goes to college and who doesn't? The new regulations being applied to private health insurance companies is guaranteed to put them out of business, leading to a single payer, government healthcare plan. The intrusion into our private lives and deliberate violations of our constitutional rights can be described as nothing less than communism.
Why was the left screaming and hollering about their rights to privacy when Bush conducted surveillance on terrorists, but are so silent on Obama's violations of their civil and privacy rights with his healthcare plan? Moreover, where is the ACLU on this invasion of privacy and other rights violations? It seems privacy and civil rights only matter to the left when a perceived threat to them comes from a Republican president.
According to an on-air radio interview by Sean Hannity with Democrat pollsters and insiders, Pat Caddell and Doug Schoen, all congressional Democrats are under orders to obey and support Obama or they will "never work again." If bribes don't work on them, then threats will.
These orders come straight down from the White House and the DNC, according to Caddell and Schoen. Anyone who defies these orders will be drummed out of office and receive no campaign financing from the DNC. The DNC and Obama will actively campaign against them to assure an end to their political careers. Is this why we are seeing a growing number of Democrats resigning from Congress?
I'm sure the threats go even deeper than that but that was as far as Caddell and Schoen would talk about on the air. They also said that Washington Democrats cannot discuss this publicly or it would also be the end of their careers. Is this why Congressman Eric Massa clammed up on the Glenn Beck show after being so outspoken on the Obama regime? Caddell and Schoen said they could talk about it because they are no longer associated with, or dependent upon the DNC for their incomes.
Both voted for Obama (although Caddell won't admit it) and both now regret their vote. Schoen openly admits that he was suckered in by the Kool-Aid being served up by Obama — he thought O would govern from the center. The discussion went on for about 20 minutes but this is it in a nutshell. What they described is just what we would expect to see under a communist Authoritarian.
Sen. Bart (Stupid) Stupak didn't just settle for an executive order from Obama on taxpayer paid abortions, he also settled for $4 billion to go to three airports in his state. That's what it cost the taxpayers for his vote. What a back stabbing SOB he turned out to be after gaining the support of pro life Democrats and conservatives. He held out for all he could get, just as Ben Nelson did, but in the end, he knew his entire future would depend on his support for the Obama agenda. Now he resigns in shame with no hope for reelection and his reputation shattered. He could have become a hero of the people instead of a betrayer of all Americans.
This is what Democrats get for defying Obama. Independent thinking is not allowed — you conform to the regime or you're out. If the right doesn't get you, then the Obama regime will. This is not a good time to be a Democrat politician unless you were elected by drug addicted, pot smoking, homosexual, San Francisco liberals — the very flowers of humanity, according to Speaker Pelosi who represents them.
The community organizer sees America as nothing more than a poor black community that needs to be organized — by him. But he is not a leader, nor an authority on anything. He is nothing more than an authoritarian symbol of the far left, guided by his communist mentoring from Saul Alinsky, Karl Marx, Frank Marshal Davis, and with the financial and ideological support of George Soros.
Why didn't the Democrats who voted for this fraud know for whom they were voting? Possibly because the media didn't do its job of vetting this subversive enemy of America who rejects our allies and befriends our enemies? Why are they still defending and supporting him, now that we all know who he is? Maybe not all of us still know who he is. Maybe Democrats should stop depending on the MSM for accurate and complete political reporting, and turn to alternative media to enlighten themselves.
© JR Dieckmann
April 12, 2010
Rarely does a day go by that we don't see the community organizer in front of a camera pretending to be an authority on something. His mindless and childish babbling is really becoming an annoyance.
We generally listen to someone speak because we can learn from their expertise. But listening to Obama speak is like listening to the ramblings of an incoherent idiot. He is an authority on nothing — unless you are interested in what Karl Marx, Saul Alinsky, Frank Marshal Davis, and George Soros have to say.
He professes on fixing the economy and a nonexistent economic recovery as though he knows what he's talking about — he doesn't.
He lectures on foreign policy and says that if we are just nice to our enemies, they will be nice to us, as though he understands how the world works — he doesn't.
He sermonizes on healthcare with false numbers and benefits as though he knows how it will affect the economy and what it will cost the American people — he doesn't.
He displays his naive ignorance on how to achieve world peace through appeasement and nuclear disarmament as though he knows anything about nuclear defense — he doesn't.
He constantly demonizes Wall Street, the free market, and anyone who disagrees with him as being responsible for the problems that he and his liberal led Congress have created, as though he understands how private enterprise and the free market works — he doesn't.
If, in fact, he does understand these things, then we can only conclude that — as many Americans believe — he is pursuing this destructive agenda with the intent of destroying the American free economy to replace it with a Marxist system of socialism. Either way, it shows him to be the enemy of the American people and the nation's Founders, and unfit to hold the office of President of the United States of America. He must be removed while we still have the capacity to do so.
Why should we listen to this flim-flam man, an authority on nothing with his own liberal utopian illusions about our country and the world; a man who claims to have been a constitutional professor, when in reality, he has no understanding of, or respect for, the Constitution? His lectures were not so much on constitutional law as they were on his own anti-constitutional views.
Why should we listen to a man who has failed at nearly everything he has attempted in his life except for campaigning on the false promise of "hope and change?" He promised hope for change in Washington politics with openness and transparency, but what he is delivering is more of the same in Washington while changing the American free society into something else. That is not the kind of change promised in his campaign.
He wasn't even much good at community organizing as is evidenced by his failed program with the Chicago Annenberg Foundation. Even his brief attempt with Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland law firm as a civil rights attorney didn't work out for long. He had no accomplishment of his own and the résumé of a career drifter before entering politics.
He slipped into the Illinois Senate by using Marxist smear tactics to force his opponents out of the race and thus won the election by default. He did the same again to ride into the U.S. Senate on a campaign powered by Chicago Marxists thugs and a socialist Democrat party. That was, of course, without acknowledging his association with, and endorsement by, the communist New Party in the 1990s.
He voted "present" 129 times in Illinois State Senate before running for the U.S. Senate. After his election by default, he served for 18 months before heading back to the campaign trail to run for president - with all of his birth and vital records sealed from public view. He has, so far, spent over a million dollars in legal fees to keep them concealed.
Why should we listen to anything this empty suit has to say? It's always the same socialist rhetoric he learned from Alinsky and Marx, but often punctuated with conservative sounding verses that completely contradict his intent. For example, he touts the opening of limited offshore oil exploration as a crumb thrown to Republicans for the passage of his upcoming energy bill. He knows that no drilling and pumping of oil will result from this for a number of reasons.
For one, "exploration" is not drilling. We don't need more exploration; we already know where the oil is. We need to drill and pump it out. For another, no matter what he says or approves, he knows that the EPA and its partners in crime, the environmental whackos will use regulations and the courts to prevent us from making use of our own natural resources.
He even brought nuclear power plants into the mix as another crumb to be feasted on by Republicans. But those few power plants he talked about have already been approved by the government, but are tied up in the courts by the same whackos and tree huggers who think modern electricity should be produced by windmills and solar panels, but without the use of transmission lines, which they consider an eyesore.
He has nothing original to say, yet after every remark, we keep hearing the same recorded applause sound track day after day as though there is really a crowd of supporters listening to and cheering for every worthless sentence. Just listen to one of his speeches and you'll hear the same sound track every time, the same voices cheering and screaming at every meaningless utterance. Just like a TV sitcom, this man is scripted and just as boring to watch, sound effects and all.
Never before in history have the American people felt as threatened by their government as they do today. This looks an awful lot like communism. By that, I do not mean Soviet Russian communism, but American communism that has its roots in early 20th century progressivism. Although the American progressive movement got its inspiration, and had lose ties with Soviet communism, it now seems more of a cradle to grave, government dependence and rule agenda that bears a striking resemblance to Russian communism.
When big centralized government dominates a forced, left-of-socialist society, you have communism. When this same government attempts to take control of the free market economy, you have communism. This is what people fear our country is becoming since the election of Barack Obama. One needs only look at the healthcare bill to see that this is true.
Why does the healthcare bill mandate a government takeover of student loans? Doesn't that give control to the Obama regime over who goes to college and who doesn't? The new regulations being applied to private health insurance companies is guaranteed to put them out of business, leading to a single payer, government healthcare plan. The intrusion into our private lives and deliberate violations of our constitutional rights can be described as nothing less than communism.
Why was the left screaming and hollering about their rights to privacy when Bush conducted surveillance on terrorists, but are so silent on Obama's violations of their civil and privacy rights with his healthcare plan? Moreover, where is the ACLU on this invasion of privacy and other rights violations? It seems privacy and civil rights only matter to the left when a perceived threat to them comes from a Republican president.
According to an on-air radio interview by Sean Hannity with Democrat pollsters and insiders, Pat Caddell and Doug Schoen, all congressional Democrats are under orders to obey and support Obama or they will "never work again." If bribes don't work on them, then threats will.
These orders come straight down from the White House and the DNC, according to Caddell and Schoen. Anyone who defies these orders will be drummed out of office and receive no campaign financing from the DNC. The DNC and Obama will actively campaign against them to assure an end to their political careers. Is this why we are seeing a growing number of Democrats resigning from Congress?
I'm sure the threats go even deeper than that but that was as far as Caddell and Schoen would talk about on the air. They also said that Washington Democrats cannot discuss this publicly or it would also be the end of their careers. Is this why Congressman Eric Massa clammed up on the Glenn Beck show after being so outspoken on the Obama regime? Caddell and Schoen said they could talk about it because they are no longer associated with, or dependent upon the DNC for their incomes.
Both voted for Obama (although Caddell won't admit it) and both now regret their vote. Schoen openly admits that he was suckered in by the Kool-Aid being served up by Obama — he thought O would govern from the center. The discussion went on for about 20 minutes but this is it in a nutshell. What they described is just what we would expect to see under a communist Authoritarian.
Sen. Bart (Stupid) Stupak didn't just settle for an executive order from Obama on taxpayer paid abortions, he also settled for $4 billion to go to three airports in his state. That's what it cost the taxpayers for his vote. What a back stabbing SOB he turned out to be after gaining the support of pro life Democrats and conservatives. He held out for all he could get, just as Ben Nelson did, but in the end, he knew his entire future would depend on his support for the Obama agenda. Now he resigns in shame with no hope for reelection and his reputation shattered. He could have become a hero of the people instead of a betrayer of all Americans.
This is what Democrats get for defying Obama. Independent thinking is not allowed — you conform to the regime or you're out. If the right doesn't get you, then the Obama regime will. This is not a good time to be a Democrat politician unless you were elected by drug addicted, pot smoking, homosexual, San Francisco liberals — the very flowers of humanity, according to Speaker Pelosi who represents them.
The community organizer sees America as nothing more than a poor black community that needs to be organized — by him. But he is not a leader, nor an authority on anything. He is nothing more than an authoritarian symbol of the far left, guided by his communist mentoring from Saul Alinsky, Karl Marx, Frank Marshal Davis, and with the financial and ideological support of George Soros.
Why didn't the Democrats who voted for this fraud know for whom they were voting? Possibly because the media didn't do its job of vetting this subversive enemy of America who rejects our allies and befriends our enemies? Why are they still defending and supporting him, now that we all know who he is? Maybe not all of us still know who he is. Maybe Democrats should stop depending on the MSM for accurate and complete political reporting, and turn to alternative media to enlighten themselves.
© JR Dieckmann
The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)
