Bryan Fischer
That's OK - - let's just outbreed 'em
By Bryan Fischer
A Reuters' article from the weekend indicates that more American women are not having children:
Nearly 20 percent of older women do not have children, compared to 10 percent in the 1970s, the Pew Research Center said.
"In recent decades, social pressure to play traditional roles has lessened in a broad variety of ways and there is more leeway for individual choice. This could play a part in lowering pressure for people to get married and bear children," said D'Vera Cohn, a co-author of the report.
"Women have more options than in the past to build strong careers and to exercise the choice not to have children," she added in an email. (emphasis mine)
And apparently the more educated they are, the fewer kids they have. Colleges and universities, dominated by secular fundamentalists and anti-marriage and anti-family feminists, are apparently leeching the maternal instincts right out of the female lemmings entrusted to their care:
Education also seems to be a factor in a woman's choice to be a mother. The more educated women are, the higher the childless rate is.
For women with a high school diploma, the rate is 17 percent, compared to 24 percent of women with a bachelor's degree.
What this means quite simply is that liberals are breeding themselves out of existence.
This of course fits with their general environmental philosophy that human beings — including children — are toxic parasites. By not having children they are simply applying a pre-emergent to protect our fragile earth from the noxious weeds of little people, who start at as small weeds but grow into big ones.
Margaret Sanger of eugenics and Planned Parenthood fame said we needed "less children from the unfit." Well, who is less "fit" to be a parent than someone who thinks of her own children as a blight on the planet rather than a precious gift from God? Some who are cheekier than I might observe that liberals are taking Sanger at her word and aren't even waiting to be involuntarily sterilized to put her counsel into practice.
Fortunately, the secular fundies haven't been able to indoctrinate all the women who attend their schools, because the stats indicate that there are far more highly educated women with children than without.
(This, by the way, is said in anticipation of what will certainly be hysterical ranting from the left that we want our women uneducated, pregnant and barefoot. Conservatives are bigger believers in education than secular fundamentalists. The difference is we believe in actual education while they believe in turning schools into brainwashing re-education camps.)
All this represents a marvelous opportunity for conservatives. We can regain political control of this country by simply following the biblical mandate to "be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth." This cultural mandate from God, as recorded in Genesis 1:28, has never been rescinded. It is as much in effect today as the moment it was first uttered.
If secular fundamentalists don't want to pay any attention to this directive, fine. To paraphrase Yogi Berra, if they're not going to have kids, who's gonna stop 'em?
To "multiply" or "increase in number," as other translations put it, means that the average family needs to have at least three children, since by having two children parents only replace themselves. (Of course, medical problems may make this impossible for some.)
Since we need to make up for the childbearing aversion of our secular fundamentalist friends, perhaps each conservative family can set out to have at least four children. It won't be too long before our poor, outflanked elites will be so badly outnumbered by a new generation imbued with the values of the Judeo-Christian tradition they may have to start having children of their own just to fight back and retain a sliver of cultural influence.
And so we will have fulfilled Margaret Sanger's dream: "more children from the fit." (Of course, for the founder of Planned Parenthood "fit" meant "white," which is why Adolph HItler loved her. By "fit," I mean parents, regardless of race, who are transmitting to their children the Judeo-Christian values on which America was built.) Who'd have thought that it would be conservative Christians who would bring her dream to realization?
Let the left rant and hyperventilate and blow up like puffer fish responding to these notions. While they erupt and steam, we will quietly go about the task of building our families and training up cultural warriors for the next generation. Let them fume in their childless rage while we celebrate the joys of parenthood and along the way implement a sure-fire long range strategy for taking our country back.
© Bryan Fischer
June 26, 2010
A Reuters' article from the weekend indicates that more American women are not having children:
Nearly 20 percent of older women do not have children, compared to 10 percent in the 1970s, the Pew Research Center said.
"In recent decades, social pressure to play traditional roles has lessened in a broad variety of ways and there is more leeway for individual choice. This could play a part in lowering pressure for people to get married and bear children," said D'Vera Cohn, a co-author of the report.
"Women have more options than in the past to build strong careers and to exercise the choice not to have children," she added in an email. (emphasis mine)
And apparently the more educated they are, the fewer kids they have. Colleges and universities, dominated by secular fundamentalists and anti-marriage and anti-family feminists, are apparently leeching the maternal instincts right out of the female lemmings entrusted to their care:
Education also seems to be a factor in a woman's choice to be a mother. The more educated women are, the higher the childless rate is.
For women with a high school diploma, the rate is 17 percent, compared to 24 percent of women with a bachelor's degree.
What this means quite simply is that liberals are breeding themselves out of existence.
This of course fits with their general environmental philosophy that human beings — including children — are toxic parasites. By not having children they are simply applying a pre-emergent to protect our fragile earth from the noxious weeds of little people, who start at as small weeds but grow into big ones.
Margaret Sanger of eugenics and Planned Parenthood fame said we needed "less children from the unfit." Well, who is less "fit" to be a parent than someone who thinks of her own children as a blight on the planet rather than a precious gift from God? Some who are cheekier than I might observe that liberals are taking Sanger at her word and aren't even waiting to be involuntarily sterilized to put her counsel into practice.
Fortunately, the secular fundies haven't been able to indoctrinate all the women who attend their schools, because the stats indicate that there are far more highly educated women with children than without.
(This, by the way, is said in anticipation of what will certainly be hysterical ranting from the left that we want our women uneducated, pregnant and barefoot. Conservatives are bigger believers in education than secular fundamentalists. The difference is we believe in actual education while they believe in turning schools into brainwashing re-education camps.)
All this represents a marvelous opportunity for conservatives. We can regain political control of this country by simply following the biblical mandate to "be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth." This cultural mandate from God, as recorded in Genesis 1:28, has never been rescinded. It is as much in effect today as the moment it was first uttered.
If secular fundamentalists don't want to pay any attention to this directive, fine. To paraphrase Yogi Berra, if they're not going to have kids, who's gonna stop 'em?
To "multiply" or "increase in number," as other translations put it, means that the average family needs to have at least three children, since by having two children parents only replace themselves. (Of course, medical problems may make this impossible for some.)
Since we need to make up for the childbearing aversion of our secular fundamentalist friends, perhaps each conservative family can set out to have at least four children. It won't be too long before our poor, outflanked elites will be so badly outnumbered by a new generation imbued with the values of the Judeo-Christian tradition they may have to start having children of their own just to fight back and retain a sliver of cultural influence.
And so we will have fulfilled Margaret Sanger's dream: "more children from the fit." (Of course, for the founder of Planned Parenthood "fit" meant "white," which is why Adolph HItler loved her. By "fit," I mean parents, regardless of race, who are transmitting to their children the Judeo-Christian values on which America was built.) Who'd have thought that it would be conservative Christians who would bring her dream to realization?
Let the left rant and hyperventilate and blow up like puffer fish responding to these notions. While they erupt and steam, we will quietly go about the task of building our families and training up cultural warriors for the next generation. Let them fume in their childless rage while we celebrate the joys of parenthood and along the way implement a sure-fire long range strategy for taking our country back.
© Bryan Fischer
The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)
