JR Dieckmann
Who commands Obama?
FacebookTwitter
By JR Dieckmann
January 10, 2010

In August of 2008, I wrote about The Senate Mentality of John McCain, who was then the Republican candidate for president. In response to this article, I found myself in a discussion with some of my fellow writers and publishers over the McCain candidacy. My position was that I could not vote for McCain and could not encourage others to do so either.

But there was only one other choice, and that was Barack Obama. I certainly couldn't vote for him, and for all the same reasons that I couldn't vote for McCain but 10 times over. To try to deter an Obama disaster, I was told that I had to hold my nose and support McCain.

I made the point to my associates that the likely outcome of the general election would be that Obama would win against McCain and that we should consider the inevitable results — that with Democrats in control of both Congress and the White House, the country would finally be able to see exactly what their agenda is and what they are all about.

On the other hand, if somehow McCain pulled off a victory, it would be a huge loss for conservatives, and the Republican Party would be encouraged to continue moving even further to the left — leaving no hope for conservatives to have any representation in government for a very long time.

The only way to move the Republican Party back to its founding conservative principles would be to lose to the Democrats for lack of conservative support. As unpleasant as it would be for a few years, the end result would ultimately be the reestablishment of a conservative Republican Party. Although this idea didn't go over well with my associates, it is exactly what is happening now.

While Republican Party leaders are beginning to recognize the value of conservative voters, they are also working toward restoring those conservative values to the party instead of being dragged ever further to the left and trying to be more like Democrats. Republican leaders are now learning the need to contrast with the Democrats, rather than appease and emulate them.

Democrat Party leaders are now dragging the Democrat Party directly into socialism and Marxism, which is not going over too well with the American people. Over the past few months we have been seeing Democrats losing elections and now dropping out of the race for the 2010 elections as a result of their socialist ideology.

Had McCain won the election, the Republican Party would be doing the same thing by compromising with the left and making nice with the Marxists in the Congress. Without contrast to the Democrat agenda, Republicans would be no better off now than they were in 2008. It has taken the disaster of Obama to make them realize that the future of the Republican Party points to the right, not to the left.

Lots of people today have little or no confidence in the leadership abilities of Barack Obama. Everyone has been asking, who's running the show? — while Obama is out running around the country, still in campaign mode and making speeches. Who is giving orders to Obama while he is out playing front man? Whose policies are really being implemented in Washington? Is it David Axelrod's? Is it Rohm Emanuel's? Or is it George Soros'?

If you think that Obama came up with the agenda that is being implemented today, think again. If you think someone behind the scenes is directing Obama, that would be wrong too.

The pieces are starting to come together now. There is no one person in charge and Obama is simply the mouthpiece of a larger regime. Who is setting the agenda? We have to look at who supported and funded the Obama campaign.

It is foreign investors. It's the World Bank. It's the IMF (International Monetary Fund). It's the Federal Reserve bank. It's Ban Ki-moon and the UN. It is the European Union. It is the Skull & Bones Society and the Bilderberg group. It is even King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia and the Palestinians to some extent.

Rather than think of it as the plans of one man, think of it as an ideology like radical Islam. The al Qaeda organization is global but bin laden doesn't call the shots, he just organizes and encourages terrorist cells around the world who share the same ideology. In a sense, bin Laden is very much like a community organizer.

But the ideology that Obama subscribes to is global socialism and communism. He takes his cues from many different special interests who all share his Marxist ideology and desire for global socialism. Nobody tells Obama what to do, instead they tell him what he should do to promote the ideology.

His objective is the same as the UN's objective — global socialism and the destruction of capitalism and the American value system. And if Islam can be a part of that plan then more power to them. Islam is a useful tool in destroying American Christian values.

As I said, the pieces are starting to come together and the dots are being connected. We have to look not only at who Obama is taking advice from, but also who is benefiting from his policies.

So far, I have only mentioned the international components of the cabal of which Obama is just one part. I should also include the domestic components such as: SEIU, ACLU, the Soros funded Apollo Foundation, the UAW and AFL-CIO, ACORN, AIG, Bear Sterns, etc. They are all part of the global socialist cabal and led by liberal Democrats.

Understand — Obama is not the leader or the head of the cabal. He too is simply one component, but a very important component in his present position. Obama knows the objectives of the cabal, he needs his advisors only to advise him on how best to achieve them.

He doesn't know squat about running this country, he knows only that he wants a global socialist world under one government. He shares that objective with those mentioned above in a "group think" kind of mentality. Kind of like a flock of birds, or an ant colony.

Although Obama was not brought into the Skull & Bones Society at Harvard University, he has connections to the group as well as close connections to the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign relations through his wife, Michelle, and close associates.

These groups are all global socialist organizations. I suspect they may have been involved in his grooming, especially in his adult years, but he was not inducted into Skull & Bones, I suspect, because his academic grades were not high enough. However, he came in contact with these people during his far left college years.

Obama is not the leader of the cabal because there is no one leader. That is the point I am making. It is a socialist cable of all that I have mentioned. I used the example of al Qaeda because Osama bin Laden, although the leader of his al Qaeda organization, is not the leader of all of the radical Islamist groups around the world. They just share the same radical Islamic beliefs and commit terrorism to promote the cause — not because they were ordered to, or directed by bin Laden.

They share a common philosophy, just as Obama does with the global socialist organizations and people. Obama is currently one component but will never rise to a more powerful position in the cabal once he is out of office. He is being used like a puppet to promote their goals.

99% of what Obama says publicly is scripted by his staff and speech writers. You don't think he actually writes his own speeches do you? That is why he is so dependent on the teleprompter. He depends on others to put words in his mouth. In his own words, he is a "blank canvas" for other to project their thoughts onto. Or to put it another way, an empty suit.

This is a result of the man having no core principles compatible with the American people. Were he to express his own views — as he did to Joe the Plumber — he would be rejected by the vast majority of the American people.

The media, although they may not see things the same way as Obama, are in his corner and cover for him because of purely political affiliation reasons. They are liberals who hate Republicans. They are interested only in promoting the Democrat party, and for that reason, are reluctant to be critical of Obama.

So if you want to know who is commanding Obama, look no further than the special interests who financed his campaign and their special interest in global socialism. Obama is simply one spoke in the wheel of Marxism which is determined to take over the world and redistribute the wealth.

© JR Dieckmann

 

The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)

 

Stephen Stone
HAPPY EASTER: A message to all who love our country and want to help save it

Stephen Stone
The most egregious lies Evan McMullin and the media have told about Sen. Mike Lee

Siena Hoefling
Protect the Children: Update with VIDEO

Stephen Stone
FLASHBACK to 2020: Dems' fake claim that Trump and Utah congressional hopeful Burgess Owens want 'renewed nuclear testing' blows up when examined

Kari Lee Fournier
Almighty God vs. Satan: American Revolution #2—It’s here!

Curtis Dahlgren
Drunk on power, the power of lies (but will it work this time?)

Cliff Kincaid
The CIA loses faith in Kamala

Desmond McGrath
Are you ready for Guy Fawkes night Nov. 5th?

Michael Bresciani
Too Late for "he said, she said" – Kamala and her liberal cadre must now drag their horrific record across the finish

Madeline Crabb
Important spiritual warning about Election 2024

Frank Louis
Okay, I get it. There’s a lot going on, a lot that’s gone on…Nonetheless

Cherie Zaslawsky
The tide has turned: Kamala sinking like a lead balloon; Trump taking off like a rocket!

Curtis Dahlgren
What's really at stake: freedom of the individual versus Collectivism

Frank Louis
Leaked passwords, burning ballot boxes, added apostrophes: What next? Oh yeah… that too.

Madeline Crabb
Election consequences – What if this one is the last?

Jerry Newcombe
What’s at stake in the current election?
  More columns

Cartoons


Click for full cartoon
More cartoons

Columnists

Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Russ J. Alan
Bonnie Alba
Chuck Baldwin
Kevin J. Banet
J. Matt Barber
Fr. Tom Bartolomeo
. . .
[See more]

Sister sites