Rev. Mark H. Creech
Did you know voters will decide on three changes to NC’s constitution this election?
FacebookTwitter
By Rev. Mark H. Creech
September 30, 2026

When North Carolinians vote this November, most people will naturally focus on the candidates. They will vote for members of Congress, state lawmakers, judges, county officials, school board members, and others.

But three proposed changes to the North Carolina Constitution will also be on the ballot. These questions may not receive as much attention as the candidates, but they are very important nonetheless. The General Assembly can usually change a law later, but changing the State Constitution is considerably more difficult. That is why voters should understand exactly what they are being asked to decide this year.

Here are the three amendments in simple terms.

1. Photo ID for Every Type of Voting

The first proposed amendment addresses voter identification.

The ballot will say:

    “Constitutional amendment to require all voters, not just those presenting to vote in person, to present photo identification before voting.”

North Carolina’s Constitution currently addresses photo identification for in-person voting. The proposed amendment would remove the words limiting that requirement to in-person voting. Instead, the Constitution would state simply that voters must present photo identification before voting.

Here is the easiest way to understand it: the constitutional requirement would apply to all voters, regardless of how they vote.

Something critical could easily be missed here. North Carolina law already requires a person voting by absentee ballot to submit a copy of photo identification or to use one of the exceptions provided by law. So this amendment would not create a voter-ID requirement for absentee voting from scratch. Instead, it would place that broader requirement directly in the State Constitution, where it would be much harder to change later because any future constitutional change would ultimately have to be approved by the voters.

That is the significant difference between placing the requirement in statute and placing it in the Constitution.

Therefore, the primary question before voters is simple:

Should North Carolina’s Constitution require photo identification for every method of voting?

2. Lowering the Maximum State Income-Tax Rate

The second proposed amendment deals with income taxes.

Currently, the North Carolina Constitution limits the income tax rate to 7 percent. The proposed amendment would lower that maximum to 3.5 percent.

The ballot will say:

    “Constitutional amendment to keep the State income tax rate from being raised higher than three and one-half percent (3.5%).”

Here is one important point to understand: this amendment would not automatically set everyone’s income tax rate to 3.5 percent. Think of it as a ceiling.

The Constitution currently limits lawmakers from raising the income-tax rate above 7 percent. If voters approve this amendment, the ceiling would drop to 3.5 percent. Future lawmakers could keep tax rates below 3.5 percent, but they could not raise them above that level without another constitutional change. The amendment would apply to both personal and corporate income taxes for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2027.

Supporters of the amendment argue that a lower constitutional ceiling would protect taxpayers from large future income-tax increases. Critics counter that it could make it harder for future lawmakers to raise revenue if North Carolina faces serious financial needs.

The basic question is:

Should North Carolina’s Constitution prevent future lawmakers from setting an income-tax rate higher than 3.5 percent?

3. Putting Limits on Local Property-Tax Increases

The third proposed amendment deals with property taxes charged by local governments.

The ballot will say:

    “Constitutional amendment requiring limits on property tax increases by local governments.”

This amendment needs a little more explanation because it does not tell voters what the actual limit would be. It does not say property-tax levies could rise only 2 percent, 3 percent, 5 percent, or any other particular number.

Instead, the amendment would require the General Assembly to pass statewide laws limiting how much local property-tax levies can increase. Those laws could also include exceptions.

Here is a simple way to picture it. Suppose a county collects $100 million in property taxes this year. The amendment would require state lawmakers to create rules limiting how much that total property-tax levy could increase in the future.

But voters are not deciding this November exactly what that limit should be. The General Assembly would decide those details later.

Supporters say such limits could help protect homeowners and other property owners from rapidly rising local property-tax collections. Critics say statewide limits could make it harder for counties and cities to fund schools, law enforcement, fire protection, roads, and other local services.

So the basic question is:

Should the State Constitution require state lawmakers to limit how much local property-tax levies can increase?

Three Constitutional Questions Christian Citizens Need to Understand

These amendments address three very different subjects: voting, state income taxes, and local property taxes. Yet all three share something important. If voters approve them, they will become part of the North Carolina Constitution.

Moreover, if approved, their effect could last for generations.

That makes these decisions different from voting on an ordinary law.

Christians should take their responsibility as citizens seriously. That means more than simply knowing the candidates’ names. It also means knowing what else is on the ballot and understanding the choices before us.

When you vote on November 3, do not stop after you finish voting for the candidates. Keep reading. Three constitutional questions will be waiting for you.

Know what they mean. Read them carefully. Make an informed decision about what should and should not be written into North Carolina’s Constitution.

__________________________________

Read this article and many others by Dr. Creech at RevMarkCreech.org.

Share Truth for Our Times

If this article helped you in some way, please consider forwarding it to a friend, pastor, or family member.

Speaking Engagements

Churches, ministries, and civic organizations are invited to prayerfully consider Dr. Mark Creech as a speaker for worship services, revival meetings, conferences, and special events. Dr. Creech speaks on biblical faith, cultural engagement, public policy, and the Christian worldview, delivering messages that are faithful to Scripture and deeply relevant to the challenges of our time.

For scheduling inquiries:

RevMarkCreech.org/booking

919-915-3033

mark@revmarkcreech.org

© Rev. Mark H. Creech

 

The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)

Click to enlarge

Rev. Mark H. Creech

Rev. Mark H. Creech served as Executive Director of the Christian Action League of North Carolina for twenty-five years. Before leading that ministry, he spent two decades in pastoral service, shepherding five Southern Baptist churches across North Carolina and one Independent Baptist congregation in upstate New York. He now serves as Director of Government Relations for Return America.

A seasoned voice for Christian values in the public square and a registered lobbyist in the North Carolina General Assembly, Rev. Creech is also a respected speaker and writer. His editorials have appeared not only on RenewAmerica.com, The Christian Post, and other online platforms, but also in most major daily newspapers throughout North Carolina.

Whether in the pulpit, the halls of government, or the media, his mission has remained steadfast – to call the Church and the nation to redemption and righteousness.

Subscribe

Receive future articles by Rev. Mark H. Creech: Click here

More by this author

 

Stephen Stone
A message to all who love our country and want to help save it

Stephen Stone
The most egregious lies Evan McMullin and the media have told about Sen. Mike Lee

Siena Hoefling
Protect the Children: Update with VIDEO

Stephen Stone
FLASHBACK to 2020: Dems' fake claim that Trump and Utah congressional hopeful Burgess Owens want 'renewed nuclear testing' blows up when examined

Rev. Mark H. Creech
Did you know voters will decide on three changes to NC’s constitution this election?

Tom DeWeese
Down the rabbit holes of regionalism

Curtis Dahlgren
RECOLLECTIONS: FYI from 2009

Rev. Mark H. Creech
What J.D. Greear gets right, and what his Christian Nationalism argument misses

Mark Malaszczyk
The idiot’s guide to excusing terrorism

Tom DeWeese
It’s getting late! It’s now or never

Mark Malaszczyk
The generation of whiners: Why today’s delayed-adulting snowflakes are an insult to the graves of actual survivors

Rev. Mark H. Creech
When Christian teaching turned on the Jews

Selwyn Duke
Indonesia’s government is trying to censor my “Great Replacement” speech

Cherie Zaslawsky
Lindsay Clancy’s Devil’s Bargain

Jerry Newcombe
Those who hate God love death

Cliff Kincaid
The latest smear of Thomas Jefferson [VIDEO]
  More columns

Cartoons


Click for full cartoon
More cartoons

Columnists

Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Russ J. Alan
Bonnie Alba
Chuck Baldwin
Kevin J. Banet
J. Matt Barber
Fr. Tom Bartolomeo
. . .
[See more]

Sister sites