Arlen Williams
GOP presidential candidates on Agenda 21 'sustainable development'
Will 2012 be the year America succumbs to global neo-Marxism?
FacebookTwitter
By Arlen Williams
January 14, 2012

Even those who believe themselves devoted patriots (including devout Christians) may foolishly be enticed by the powers that be, into violating Americans' sacred and essential Popular and national Sovereignties. It has been happening for a long time, now.

People who believe in a Sovereign nation called the United States of America are being duped into not only violating the mandates of our Constitution, but even worse, into nullifying our own Declaration of Independence from the control of foreign, kleptocratic power.

This is the tragedy for us all, laying under the noses of those who foolishly follow the stratagems of those seeking hegemony over us via "global governance" and it's ploy, "sustainable development," a.k.a., "millennium goals," a.k.a., "green growth," as outlined in United Nations' Agenda 21. It is being executed by ICLEI, regional councils, Barack Obama's Executive Order 13575, and in many other ways governmental and paragovernmental, in corporations, finance, the news and entertainment media, and in eduction.

However, some seem not so fooled.

In alphabetical order, these are positions of the remaining Republican candidates for United States President, regarding this globalist warfare upon America and all the nations of the world.


Newt Gingrich, his opposition to Agenda 21:

Video, "Newt on Agenda 21," uploaded July 26, 2011
 

Video, "Newt on Agenda21.mov," uploaded September 16, 2011
Counterpoint:
Jon Huntsman, a proponent of sustainable development, uses the peer pressure ploy of a propagandist, pardon the alliteration, against those seeking valid science about the climate, instead of the party line of the globalist powers that be:

Video, "Huntsman Spars with Fox & Friends Hosts over Global Warming," August 29, 2011
An article from the ecofascist left, supporting Jon Huntsman over other Republican candidates:
Ron Paul, his opposition to Agenda 21, within the limits of a libertarian's revised interpretation of federalism (also declares his opposition the United Nations as a whole, plus the IMF and the Federal Reserve):

Video, "Ron Paul Answers Agenda 21 Question," uploaded August 10, 2011

Rick Perry, his cooperation with Agenda 21 related transnationalist/globalist moves and liaisons: Perry's comments in opposition to drastic policy based upon man-made global warming theory, in this propagandized Associated Press (AP) video:

"Video Essay: Perry vs. Global Warming in NH," August 18, 2011

Mitt Romney, his favoring of and participation in Agenda 21... ...and one may page search "Romney" in this expansive collection of evidence: Romney, during the 2008 campaign, stating that government should at times take the lead in reducing "green house gas emissions":

Video, "Romney answers question about renewables and green jobs," uploaded December 27, 2007

Rick Santorum, answers generally, when asked specifically about Agenda 21:
Bill McNally: [A question about Agenda 21] Question to describe Agenda 21, what it means for America’s sovereignty, and how Santorum, as President, would enforce it. Santorum: There are a lot of things that the U.N. promulgates through its various committees and agencies. The United Nations should serve some (emphasis his) on security issues, but a lot of the policies from the United Nations would be problematic for America. “We will not give legitimacy to UN organisations that promulgate a laundry list of ideas…. [including abortion] I’m not going to, as President, have our country participate in things that are antithetical to our values.” They are trying to impose international law on the sovereignty of the United States. Cited the Rights of the Child as a means of undermining parental authority. [This blogger will note that the Rights of the Child inexplicably does not include the right to be born without someone stabbing you in the head with a fork.]

Directly related, here is an assessment of each candidate's' stance on the question...
  • Will you abolish the Environmental Protection Agencey (EPA)?
  1. Gingrich Yes. SOURCE
  2. Huntsman Rein it in, not abolish it. SOURCE
  3. Paul Yes. SOURCE
  4. Perry Yes, and rebuild a new environmental agency. SOURCE
  5. Romney Supports much of the agency’s mission but would reform some things. SOURCE
  6. Santorum Modify it, not abolish it. SOURCE

in AsMarion.com, republished from Tea Party Voter Guide, New Hampshire Edition


For further information on the candidates regarding the American Sovereignties and threats to them, including Agenda 21, see... And for more on Agenda 21, click that tag link, paging/scrolling down to the earliest, first. Caveat: all analysis of the behavior of human beings must be dynamic, not static. Let us keep asking questions. Here is one suggestion for ongoing activism: We look forward to providing further information demonstrating key candidates' stances on America's most essential Sovereignty issues, in future articles and blog entries.

_____________

Permission granted to republish this article, in part, or in whole with credit to GulagBound.com and backlink.

hat tip: The many awake, aware, and alert United States Citizens, who are pressing our candidates regarding our Sovereignty, including that done through the Tea Party movement, though others tragically focus only upon money.

© Arlen Williams

 

The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)

 

Stephen Stone
HAPPY EASTER: A message to all who love our country and want to help save it

Stephen Stone
The most egregious lies Evan McMullin and the media have told about Sen. Mike Lee

Siena Hoefling
Protect the Children: Update with VIDEO

Stephen Stone
FLASHBACK to 2020: Dems' fake claim that Trump and Utah congressional hopeful Burgess Owens want 'renewed nuclear testing' blows up when examined

Cliff Kincaid
They want to kill Elon Musk

Jerry Newcombe
Four presidents on the wonder of Christmas

Pete Riehm
Biblical masculinity versus toxic masculinity

Tom DeWeese
American Policy Center promises support for anti-UN legislation

Joan Swirsky
Yep…still the smartest guy in the room

Michael Bresciani
How does Trump fit into last days prophecies?

Curtis Dahlgren
George Washington walks into a bar

Matt C. Abbott
Two pro-life stalwarts have passed on

Victor Sharpe
Any Israeli alliances should include the restoration of a just, moral, and enduring pact with the Kurdish people

Linda Kimball
Man as God: The primordial heresy and the evolutionary science of becoming God

Sylvia Thompson
Should the Village People be a part of Trump's Inauguration Ceremony? No—but I suspect they will be

Jerry Newcombe
Reflections on the Good Samaritan ethic
  More columns

Cartoons


Click for full cartoon
More cartoons

Columnists

Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Russ J. Alan
Bonnie Alba
Chuck Baldwin
Kevin J. Banet
J. Matt Barber
Fr. Tom Bartolomeo
. . .
[See more]

Sister sites