Johnny D. Symon
A fabric of evil weave
By Johnny D. Symon
During those weeks of absence from my space on the bridgehead over fallen politics where a further torrent of unpalatable water had passed under, still little or none had escaped my notice. For this week however I've narrowed things down to cover one simple package, a simple package created by simpletons of a shallow political nature and mindset. Sometimes I get to thinking that those worthless bums are following Biblical prophecy as if they were actors dissembling a script, for all that they do is firmly and clearly laid down for those with ears to hear and eyes to see.
Yesterday Barry White House received his Ali Ignoble Peace Prize for bringing peace he never brought. The European media are aflame over the little issue of more troops to Afghanistan in light of Barry's worthless and unwarranted reward. Yet for those of us still holding firm on the aspect of faith, Barry's reward is no more than an example of the wicked receiving their desserts in this world, only to receive their just rewards in the world to come. Some of us work toward the future and others act in view of the present, self-service, and the status quo.
It's a chalk and cheese thing; the big irreconcilable difference between faith and folly, savior and salvager. As Barry prepares to carry his worthless medal to yet another empty cause, the "Coke 15, Coke'n haben" gasbag event, the difference between savior and salvager is something we all should plumb and seek to discover. Maybe December is one of the best months of the year for that consideration for both Jews and Christians alike, for, you see, the Jews celebrate December with Chanukah, a festival held in remembrance of the re-dedication of the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem after the Hebrew revolt that removed the Seleucids from Israeli territory.
The festival of Chanukah today is held in the spirit of joy and happiness, yet the origins of that festival were of a most bloody nature, nonetheless, salvation was the outcome of bloody conflict and a righteous victory. Though it's worthy of note, and of fair warning, to consider that Western politicians are planning to re-order Jerusalem by dividing it between two States; one real, one false; a Jerusalem that will become the capital of both. Again, a stark difference between savior and salvage collector are readily apparent for the borders of Israel were established by God Himself, and they're not negotiable.
The "Coke'n haben" gasbag event is an ultimate example of worthless individuals embarking on an equally worthless crusade, the world's salvage collecting messiahs promising to save the world and all that is therein, by cleaning it up. For want of a better term, henceforth I'll collectively name those losers "The Salvaging Army!" They claim to believe that Creation needs protecting and re-creating, yet by direct inference they thus claim that a perfect God failed to produce a perfect product. Clearly this is a lie from hell, a falsity that I intend to resolve here, as many others are trying to do elsewhere.
The whole climate change lie, as far as I can see, emanates through a misrepresentation of mankind's obligations. A certain British gentleman during his recent lectures failed to understand the truth of Genesis 1:22. I noted that in little more than 5 minutes into one lecture he quoted Genesis 1:22 ("And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth."), then in reference to this passage he made the remark;
"Very clear what our obligations are as stewards of the planet. We are to look after all that is in it, and over it and under it, and swimming in the sea."
Whereas in fact it said nothing of the sort. I highlighted a similar fault sometime back, in "Till ..." but this one appeared because the man in question failed to logically grasp the art of dispensation. There are six days of creation mentioned. Verse 22 falls within the 5th day, whereas the creation of Adam and Eve occurred on the 6th. Plainly put, the statement of Genesis 1:22 was addressed to the newly created creatures, and not to mankind, for one simple reason; man, neither Adam, Eve, and their progeny, had been created at that time. Verse 26 sees Adam entering the picture. Verse 22 therefore was a command for the newly created fowls and fish to go out and do what came naturally, according to their design.
When Adam was created a few verses later on, on the 6th day, the command that he was ordained to carry out was radically different to that which had been offered earlier. His obligation was simple and sweet;
" .. and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth."
"Stewards of the planet" is a hellish misrepresentation of mankind's obligation. "Dominion" Dominance or power through legal authority, not "stewardship," was the order of the day. A steward is a servant, whereas someone with "dominion" is a ruler, that's why Jesus said,
"Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written,
Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and Him only
shalt thou serve."
"Him only shalt thou serve," is the key point to the verse, for to be stewards of the planet finds us in the position of serving two masters. And that's where it's at, and all that it is behind those haughty and lying bums at Coke'n haben.
I listened to one of those self-same bums two days back. The loon was a high representative for the UN, and when I say high I mean high. His appearance was really something else. I'm sure that he was on something or other. Not only that, but he was the fair spittin' of an emaciated Star Trek Klingon, but without the intellect of one. He sat in front of the press stating that "we should eat less meat because it produces CO2," further stating that "a kilo of meat issues CO2 whereas a kilo of apples don't !!" And maybe he has a point because he himself was a meathead, so I was well prepared to remove his nut and replace it with a big bag of red Georgia apples !! Yet even without them, or especially without them, the loon was rotten to the core and mad as a hatter.
I reckon that if he ever blessed the world through receiving a well-earned beating around, the lucky givers would be wasting their breath and energy, along with CO2, for neither Mr Klingon of the UN, or any of his comrades, are intelligent enough, nay spiritual enough, to learn a lesson from it. And besides, the Good Book says, "Vengeance is mine. I will repay!" Whether Divine Judgment will involve CO2 emissions I know not, but hey, it's gonna be a fun Day all the same.
There was a fun day in Southern Spain recently, when in court Greenpeace were amerced for alleging, through the use of the Gore Photoshop method, that an area of beachfront real estate was going to get immersed under seawater with the so-called rising sea levels, which had me wondering if Al Gore would be as delighted if the likes of Greenpeace ruined his new $4 million condo investment situated right down on the seafront of Fisherman's Wharf, San Francisco, by equally depicting his new seafront residence sharing space with starfish and tuna.
Nevertheless, the point is that sooner or later Greenpeace's fate in Spain is certain to cross the Atlantic and begin sticking to other Photoshop doomsayers, of this I'm certain, because it's not a laughing matter, to invest your life savings in a shore front project, to then find a bunch of lying kooks depicting it underwater.
Another recent event involving the climate change liars was East Anglia University's Climategate leaks. Nigh on everyone I listened to blamed it on the Russos, when to me it was clearly an inside job. The damage limitation bozos got to work, though the fact remained that the real truth was finally out, in spite of Google's mighty efforts at cutting Climategate out of the search suggestions. I wonder why?
Maybe it's about time, yet again, for yours truly to modify another fine thought by Nietzsche. He said, "Sensuality often hastens the growth of love so much that the roots remain weak and are easily torn up." Those that "love the world" are no different to those of old who worshiped Diana or Dagon. The entire theological framework of their worthless beliefs were based on the love of a powerless and worthless entity. The roots of their faith were shallow and easily torn, whereas the roots of faith in The Creator of all things are indestructible.
You see, as I said at the start, the whole climate change lie, as far as I can see, emanates through a misrepresentation of mankind's obligations, and I know I've covered this before, yet again it must be said, especially to Jews and Christians, that mankind's obligations are clearly defined and outlined for all to see. King Solomon presented it here;
"Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and
keep His commandments: for this is the whole duty of man."
— Ecclesiastes 12:13
Small wonder the Commandments are disappearing from Town Halls throughout the States. To fear God and keep His Commandments are all she wrote, there's nothing else required but that. And guess what: Nowhere in the Commandments can be found an order to become "stewards of the planet" and there's a simple reason for this, and here it is:
Both God's Laws and the penalties, ie, judgments, for breaking them concern man's relationship, or otherwise , to his Creator, and man's subsequent relationship, or otherwise, to his fellow human beings. Of course there are minor laws laid down, especially in the Talmud and other books, concerning how we treat the plant and animal kingdom, but, yet again, those laws, when put into practice, enable us to better serve and better treat our fellow human beings. Take for example the law concerning young fruit trees. It's considered wrong to eat or profit from a tree's harvest until that tree is 5-years old (Leviticus 19:25). Put simply, through practicing this method it instills a sense of duty to children, impelling us not to profit from their fruit. It should direct our attention to the evils of child labor and abuse.
In every which way but loose, the practice of God's Laws in everyday life enables us to treat fellow human beings, men, women, and children, in the best way possible. That's why the makeshift man-made laws of the evil and the unjust can be no substitute for the genuine and timeless article, for those Laws change not, whereas the laws of the wicked change with the slightest breeze.
Yet again I feel a slight misquote coming on, in direct reference to those climate change Salvaging Army of liars and cheats. Albert Einstein once offered ...
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again
and expecting the same results."
And that's where those lunatics are firmly based. One lie to cover another just revealed. A patchwork quilt . Our 21st Century Salvaging Army present us with no more than a stinking fabric of evil weave.
© Johnny D. Symon
December 11, 2009
During those weeks of absence from my space on the bridgehead over fallen politics where a further torrent of unpalatable water had passed under, still little or none had escaped my notice. For this week however I've narrowed things down to cover one simple package, a simple package created by simpletons of a shallow political nature and mindset. Sometimes I get to thinking that those worthless bums are following Biblical prophecy as if they were actors dissembling a script, for all that they do is firmly and clearly laid down for those with ears to hear and eyes to see.
Yesterday Barry White House received his Ali Ignoble Peace Prize for bringing peace he never brought. The European media are aflame over the little issue of more troops to Afghanistan in light of Barry's worthless and unwarranted reward. Yet for those of us still holding firm on the aspect of faith, Barry's reward is no more than an example of the wicked receiving their desserts in this world, only to receive their just rewards in the world to come. Some of us work toward the future and others act in view of the present, self-service, and the status quo.
It's a chalk and cheese thing; the big irreconcilable difference between faith and folly, savior and salvager. As Barry prepares to carry his worthless medal to yet another empty cause, the "Coke 15, Coke'n haben" gasbag event, the difference between savior and salvager is something we all should plumb and seek to discover. Maybe December is one of the best months of the year for that consideration for both Jews and Christians alike, for, you see, the Jews celebrate December with Chanukah, a festival held in remembrance of the re-dedication of the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem after the Hebrew revolt that removed the Seleucids from Israeli territory.
The festival of Chanukah today is held in the spirit of joy and happiness, yet the origins of that festival were of a most bloody nature, nonetheless, salvation was the outcome of bloody conflict and a righteous victory. Though it's worthy of note, and of fair warning, to consider that Western politicians are planning to re-order Jerusalem by dividing it between two States; one real, one false; a Jerusalem that will become the capital of both. Again, a stark difference between savior and salvage collector are readily apparent for the borders of Israel were established by God Himself, and they're not negotiable.
The "Coke'n haben" gasbag event is an ultimate example of worthless individuals embarking on an equally worthless crusade, the world's salvage collecting messiahs promising to save the world and all that is therein, by cleaning it up. For want of a better term, henceforth I'll collectively name those losers "The Salvaging Army!" They claim to believe that Creation needs protecting and re-creating, yet by direct inference they thus claim that a perfect God failed to produce a perfect product. Clearly this is a lie from hell, a falsity that I intend to resolve here, as many others are trying to do elsewhere.
The whole climate change lie, as far as I can see, emanates through a misrepresentation of mankind's obligations. A certain British gentleman during his recent lectures failed to understand the truth of Genesis 1:22. I noted that in little more than 5 minutes into one lecture he quoted Genesis 1:22 ("And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth."), then in reference to this passage he made the remark;
"Very clear what our obligations are as stewards of the planet. We are to look after all that is in it, and over it and under it, and swimming in the sea."
Whereas in fact it said nothing of the sort. I highlighted a similar fault sometime back, in "Till ..." but this one appeared because the man in question failed to logically grasp the art of dispensation. There are six days of creation mentioned. Verse 22 falls within the 5th day, whereas the creation of Adam and Eve occurred on the 6th. Plainly put, the statement of Genesis 1:22 was addressed to the newly created creatures, and not to mankind, for one simple reason; man, neither Adam, Eve, and their progeny, had been created at that time. Verse 26 sees Adam entering the picture. Verse 22 therefore was a command for the newly created fowls and fish to go out and do what came naturally, according to their design.
When Adam was created a few verses later on, on the 6th day, the command that he was ordained to carry out was radically different to that which had been offered earlier. His obligation was simple and sweet;
" .. and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth."
"Stewards of the planet" is a hellish misrepresentation of mankind's obligation. "Dominion" Dominance or power through legal authority, not "stewardship," was the order of the day. A steward is a servant, whereas someone with "dominion" is a ruler, that's why Jesus said,
"Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written,
Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and Him only
shalt thou serve."
"Him only shalt thou serve," is the key point to the verse, for to be stewards of the planet finds us in the position of serving two masters. And that's where it's at, and all that it is behind those haughty and lying bums at Coke'n haben.
I listened to one of those self-same bums two days back. The loon was a high representative for the UN, and when I say high I mean high. His appearance was really something else. I'm sure that he was on something or other. Not only that, but he was the fair spittin' of an emaciated Star Trek Klingon, but without the intellect of one. He sat in front of the press stating that "we should eat less meat because it produces CO2," further stating that "a kilo of meat issues CO2 whereas a kilo of apples don't !!" And maybe he has a point because he himself was a meathead, so I was well prepared to remove his nut and replace it with a big bag of red Georgia apples !! Yet even without them, or especially without them, the loon was rotten to the core and mad as a hatter.
I reckon that if he ever blessed the world through receiving a well-earned beating around, the lucky givers would be wasting their breath and energy, along with CO2, for neither Mr Klingon of the UN, or any of his comrades, are intelligent enough, nay spiritual enough, to learn a lesson from it. And besides, the Good Book says, "Vengeance is mine. I will repay!" Whether Divine Judgment will involve CO2 emissions I know not, but hey, it's gonna be a fun Day all the same.
There was a fun day in Southern Spain recently, when in court Greenpeace were amerced for alleging, through the use of the Gore Photoshop method, that an area of beachfront real estate was going to get immersed under seawater with the so-called rising sea levels, which had me wondering if Al Gore would be as delighted if the likes of Greenpeace ruined his new $4 million condo investment situated right down on the seafront of Fisherman's Wharf, San Francisco, by equally depicting his new seafront residence sharing space with starfish and tuna.
Nevertheless, the point is that sooner or later Greenpeace's fate in Spain is certain to cross the Atlantic and begin sticking to other Photoshop doomsayers, of this I'm certain, because it's not a laughing matter, to invest your life savings in a shore front project, to then find a bunch of lying kooks depicting it underwater.
Another recent event involving the climate change liars was East Anglia University's Climategate leaks. Nigh on everyone I listened to blamed it on the Russos, when to me it was clearly an inside job. The damage limitation bozos got to work, though the fact remained that the real truth was finally out, in spite of Google's mighty efforts at cutting Climategate out of the search suggestions. I wonder why?
Maybe it's about time, yet again, for yours truly to modify another fine thought by Nietzsche. He said, "Sensuality often hastens the growth of love so much that the roots remain weak and are easily torn up." Those that "love the world" are no different to those of old who worshiped Diana or Dagon. The entire theological framework of their worthless beliefs were based on the love of a powerless and worthless entity. The roots of their faith were shallow and easily torn, whereas the roots of faith in The Creator of all things are indestructible.
You see, as I said at the start, the whole climate change lie, as far as I can see, emanates through a misrepresentation of mankind's obligations, and I know I've covered this before, yet again it must be said, especially to Jews and Christians, that mankind's obligations are clearly defined and outlined for all to see. King Solomon presented it here;
"Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and
keep His commandments: for this is the whole duty of man."
— Ecclesiastes 12:13
Small wonder the Commandments are disappearing from Town Halls throughout the States. To fear God and keep His Commandments are all she wrote, there's nothing else required but that. And guess what: Nowhere in the Commandments can be found an order to become "stewards of the planet" and there's a simple reason for this, and here it is:
Both God's Laws and the penalties, ie, judgments, for breaking them concern man's relationship, or otherwise , to his Creator, and man's subsequent relationship, or otherwise, to his fellow human beings. Of course there are minor laws laid down, especially in the Talmud and other books, concerning how we treat the plant and animal kingdom, but, yet again, those laws, when put into practice, enable us to better serve and better treat our fellow human beings. Take for example the law concerning young fruit trees. It's considered wrong to eat or profit from a tree's harvest until that tree is 5-years old (Leviticus 19:25). Put simply, through practicing this method it instills a sense of duty to children, impelling us not to profit from their fruit. It should direct our attention to the evils of child labor and abuse.
In every which way but loose, the practice of God's Laws in everyday life enables us to treat fellow human beings, men, women, and children, in the best way possible. That's why the makeshift man-made laws of the evil and the unjust can be no substitute for the genuine and timeless article, for those Laws change not, whereas the laws of the wicked change with the slightest breeze.
Yet again I feel a slight misquote coming on, in direct reference to those climate change Salvaging Army of liars and cheats. Albert Einstein once offered ...
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again
and expecting the same results."
And that's where those lunatics are firmly based. One lie to cover another just revealed. A patchwork quilt . Our 21st Century Salvaging Army present us with no more than a stinking fabric of evil weave.
© Johnny D. Symon
The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)