Satan wins back the scouts
Scott Lively
Many pundits are weighing in on the decision by the Boy Scouts of America to allow open homosexuality into the organization. I, for one, am not surprised. The very fact that the leadership organized a vote on the question instead of simply standing firm on its existing policy, which was backed by a large majority of scouting parents and a US Supreme Court victory no less, told me all I needed to know. The amoral fat cats now running this once venerable organization wanted the change to preserve their "gay"-controlled corporate donor base but wanted the blame to fall on others.
If anyone really believes this already destructive capitulation by the BSA will remain limited to the boys and not extend to the leaders, or that the homo-fascists are going to be placated by this half-measure, I have a bridge I'd like to sell you. I say we should take the whole organization down as quickly as possible to make room for a replacement that will protect and serve the boys and not the perverts. Here is my contribution to that effort: a little historical context to show the danger America's youth are now facing in a homosexualized scouting movement. As the saying goes, those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat its tragedies.
It is not generally known, but the youth hiking and camping movement we know today in America as the Boy Scouts, has its roots in pederasty. Pederasty, also known as Man/Boy Sex, is the overlapping common core of the now open male homosexual and still hidden male pedophile communities. It involves primarily sexual relationships between adult men of any age and boys roughly from age 7 to 17. It is the most common form of homosexual relationship in history and the means by which a great many young men are recruited into a life-long homosexual identity.
There are no doubt many hidden and very cautious pederasts already lurking in the Boy Scout leadership who are now salivating over the prospect of having in their care self-declared "gay" boys whom they can approach sexually with far less fear of exposure. "Gay" boys who can also help to recruit their peers into intergenerational "gay" relationships.
It shouldn't surprise anyone that pederasts naturally gravitate to all-male societies. Consider the Roman Catholic priesthood. Look at their list of victims and you will see that the priesthood scandal was not about pedophilia, but pederasty, a form of homosexuality. The Boy Scouts of America is no different, except now the organization itself will do most of the work of recruiting the victims, and is also likely to try and cover up all evidence of the problem so as not to admit their policy change was to blame. (The latter phenomenon seems to be occurring in our military, vis a vis male-on-male rapes, since the repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell.) But there's nothing new under the sun. The world has seen open homosexuality in scouting before, as well as its consequences.
Like so many evils in our modern world, the homosexual roots of scouting go back to Germany, where a pair of pederasts, Karl Fischer and Wilhelm Jansen, and homosexual youth leader Hans Blueher turned a small newly-formed hiking club of adolescent boys into a nation-wide scouting organization called the Wandervogel (Wandering Birds).
In Nationalism and Sexuality: Respectability and Abnormal Sexuality in Modern Europe, German historian George L. Mosse writes that in Germany "ideas of homosexuality as the basis of a better society can be found at the turn of the century within the German Youth Movement" (Mosse:87), and pederast Parker Rossman in Sexual Experience Between Men and Boys, details an
"effort to revive the Greek ideal of pedagogic pederasty, in the movement of Wandering Youth [Wandervoegel]. Modern gay-homosexuality also can trace some of its roots to that movement of men and boys who wandered around the countryside, hiking and singing hand-in-hand, enjoying nature, life together, and their sexuality. Ultimately Hitler used and transformed the movement – much as the Romans had abused the paiderastia of the ancient Greeks – expanding and building upon its romanticism as a basis for the Nazi Party (Rossman:103).
Another homosexualist, Richard Mills, explains in Gay Roots: Twenty Years of Gay Sunshine how the Wandervoegel movement was
"started in 1890 by a fifteen-year-old student named Hermann Hoffman. For several years the open-air lifestyle of these boys grew increasingly popular. They developed their own form of greeting, the "Heil" salute, and "much of the vocabulary...[which] was later appropriated by the Nazis" (Mills:168).
It was the pederast Karl Fischer who invented the Wandervogel name in 1901. He was a teacher who styled himself as the main leader of the group, giving himself the title der Fuehrer (Mills:153). Hans Blueher, then just seventeen years old, organized the most ambitious Wandervoegel excursion to that date in 1905. It was on this trip that Blueher met Wilhelm Jansen. At this time theWandervoegel numbered fewer than one hundred young men, but eventually the number of youths involved in Wandervoegel-type groups in Europe reached 60,000.
Wilhelm Jansen became an influential leader in the Wandervoegel, but rumors of his homosexuality disturbed German society. In 1911, Jansen addressed the issue in a circular to Wandervoegel parents. Jansen told them, "As long as they conduct themselves properly with your sons, you will have to accustom yourselves to the presence of so-called homosexuals in your ranks" (Mills:167). Hans Blueher further substantiated the fact that the movement had become a vehicle for homosexual recruitment of boys with his publication of The German Wandervoegel Movement as an Erotic Phenomenon in 1914 Mills writes,
[T]he Wandervoegel offered youth the chance to escape bourgeois German society by retreating back to nature...But how was this accomplished? What made it possible for the lifestyle created within the Wandervoegel to differ significantly from its bourgeois parent? The answer is simple: the Wandervoegel was founded upon homosexual, as opposed to heterosexual sentiments ...In order to understand the success of the movement, one must acknowledge the homosexual component of its leaders...Just as the leaders were attracted to the boys, so were the boys attracted to their leaders. In both cases the attraction was sexually based (Mills 152-53).
Though largely neglected by historians, Hans Blueher was enormously important to Nazi culture. In Germany's National Vice, German Jewish writer Samuel Igra reports that in the Third Reich "Blueher...[was] adopted by the Nazis as an apostle of social reform. And one of his disciples, Professor Alfred Bauemler...[became] Director of the Political Institute at the University of Berlin" (Igra:75). Writing before the collapse of the Third Reich, he adds that "[Blueher's teaching] has been systematically inculcated by the Nazi Press, especially Himmler's official organ, Das Schwarze Korps, and has been adopted in practice as the basis of German social organization. The Nazi élite are being brought up in segregated male communities calledOrdensburgen. These are to replace the family as the groundwork on which the state is to rest" (Igra:87).
Who today in America are the "Apostles of Social Reform?" Aren't they the very militants and agitators who just have forced the BSA leadership to cry "Uncle?" Aren't their tactics of bullying and suppression of dissent the very epitome of the Nazi Brownshirts? Now that they have gained power over the Boy Scouts (as indeed they have), do we expect them to do anything but inculcate their values into these young men, the cream of America's future leaders?
Sitting here contemplating the ultimate effects of the Boy Scouts decision, I can't help but recall the "satirical" essay by "Michael Swift: Gay Revolutionary" that was published in Gay Community News, Feb. 15-21, 1987 and subsequently entered into The Congressional Record. Although this article claims to be satirical, history has proven it to be a true and chilling picture of the "gay" mind and goals. "Michael Swift" is the Apostle of Social Reform whose vision is coming true before our eyes.
Eighteen years after the German scouting movement began, Lord Baden Powell formed the English organization in 1908 that our Boy Scouts is based upon. Powell is often accused by "gays" of having been a homosexual himself, but their evidence is very flimsy and I don't believe they are correct. In fact, I think Lord Powell was successful only because he built his organization on Biblical values. It is only these values that have protected the Boy Scouts of America from following the example of the Wandervogel and from control by people like "Michael Swift." And frankly, it is only the very public restoration of those values that have allowed the Catholic Church to begin to restore confidence in its priests.
Sadly, the Boy Scouts of America has gone the opposite direction and officially voted to abandon Biblical values and must now begin to experience the consequences of its cowardice and stupidity. One consequence should be the complete and immediate withdrawal of all support by all of us who still hold to those values.
Reprinted from Alan Keyes Is Loyal to Liberty.
May 27, 2013
Many pundits are weighing in on the decision by the Boy Scouts of America to allow open homosexuality into the organization. I, for one, am not surprised. The very fact that the leadership organized a vote on the question instead of simply standing firm on its existing policy, which was backed by a large majority of scouting parents and a US Supreme Court victory no less, told me all I needed to know. The amoral fat cats now running this once venerable organization wanted the change to preserve their "gay"-controlled corporate donor base but wanted the blame to fall on others.If anyone really believes this already destructive capitulation by the BSA will remain limited to the boys and not extend to the leaders, or that the homo-fascists are going to be placated by this half-measure, I have a bridge I'd like to sell you. I say we should take the whole organization down as quickly as possible to make room for a replacement that will protect and serve the boys and not the perverts. Here is my contribution to that effort: a little historical context to show the danger America's youth are now facing in a homosexualized scouting movement. As the saying goes, those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat its tragedies.
It is not generally known, but the youth hiking and camping movement we know today in America as the Boy Scouts, has its roots in pederasty. Pederasty, also known as Man/Boy Sex, is the overlapping common core of the now open male homosexual and still hidden male pedophile communities. It involves primarily sexual relationships between adult men of any age and boys roughly from age 7 to 17. It is the most common form of homosexual relationship in history and the means by which a great many young men are recruited into a life-long homosexual identity.
There are no doubt many hidden and very cautious pederasts already lurking in the Boy Scout leadership who are now salivating over the prospect of having in their care self-declared "gay" boys whom they can approach sexually with far less fear of exposure. "Gay" boys who can also help to recruit their peers into intergenerational "gay" relationships.
It shouldn't surprise anyone that pederasts naturally gravitate to all-male societies. Consider the Roman Catholic priesthood. Look at their list of victims and you will see that the priesthood scandal was not about pedophilia, but pederasty, a form of homosexuality. The Boy Scouts of America is no different, except now the organization itself will do most of the work of recruiting the victims, and is also likely to try and cover up all evidence of the problem so as not to admit their policy change was to blame. (The latter phenomenon seems to be occurring in our military, vis a vis male-on-male rapes, since the repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell.) But there's nothing new under the sun. The world has seen open homosexuality in scouting before, as well as its consequences.
Like so many evils in our modern world, the homosexual roots of scouting go back to Germany, where a pair of pederasts, Karl Fischer and Wilhelm Jansen, and homosexual youth leader Hans Blueher turned a small newly-formed hiking club of adolescent boys into a nation-wide scouting organization called the Wandervogel (Wandering Birds).
In Nationalism and Sexuality: Respectability and Abnormal Sexuality in Modern Europe, German historian George L. Mosse writes that in Germany "ideas of homosexuality as the basis of a better society can be found at the turn of the century within the German Youth Movement" (Mosse:87), and pederast Parker Rossman in Sexual Experience Between Men and Boys, details an
"effort to revive the Greek ideal of pedagogic pederasty, in the movement of Wandering Youth [Wandervoegel]. Modern gay-homosexuality also can trace some of its roots to that movement of men and boys who wandered around the countryside, hiking and singing hand-in-hand, enjoying nature, life together, and their sexuality. Ultimately Hitler used and transformed the movement – much as the Romans had abused the paiderastia of the ancient Greeks – expanding and building upon its romanticism as a basis for the Nazi Party (Rossman:103).
Another homosexualist, Richard Mills, explains in Gay Roots: Twenty Years of Gay Sunshine how the Wandervoegel movement was
"started in 1890 by a fifteen-year-old student named Hermann Hoffman. For several years the open-air lifestyle of these boys grew increasingly popular. They developed their own form of greeting, the "Heil" salute, and "much of the vocabulary...[which] was later appropriated by the Nazis" (Mills:168).
It was the pederast Karl Fischer who invented the Wandervogel name in 1901. He was a teacher who styled himself as the main leader of the group, giving himself the title der Fuehrer (Mills:153). Hans Blueher, then just seventeen years old, organized the most ambitious Wandervoegel excursion to that date in 1905. It was on this trip that Blueher met Wilhelm Jansen. At this time theWandervoegel numbered fewer than one hundred young men, but eventually the number of youths involved in Wandervoegel-type groups in Europe reached 60,000.
Wilhelm Jansen became an influential leader in the Wandervoegel, but rumors of his homosexuality disturbed German society. In 1911, Jansen addressed the issue in a circular to Wandervoegel parents. Jansen told them, "As long as they conduct themselves properly with your sons, you will have to accustom yourselves to the presence of so-called homosexuals in your ranks" (Mills:167). Hans Blueher further substantiated the fact that the movement had become a vehicle for homosexual recruitment of boys with his publication of The German Wandervoegel Movement as an Erotic Phenomenon in 1914 Mills writes,
[T]he Wandervoegel offered youth the chance to escape bourgeois German society by retreating back to nature...But how was this accomplished? What made it possible for the lifestyle created within the Wandervoegel to differ significantly from its bourgeois parent? The answer is simple: the Wandervoegel was founded upon homosexual, as opposed to heterosexual sentiments ...In order to understand the success of the movement, one must acknowledge the homosexual component of its leaders...Just as the leaders were attracted to the boys, so were the boys attracted to their leaders. In both cases the attraction was sexually based (Mills 152-53).
Though largely neglected by historians, Hans Blueher was enormously important to Nazi culture. In Germany's National Vice, German Jewish writer Samuel Igra reports that in the Third Reich "Blueher...[was] adopted by the Nazis as an apostle of social reform. And one of his disciples, Professor Alfred Bauemler...[became] Director of the Political Institute at the University of Berlin" (Igra:75). Writing before the collapse of the Third Reich, he adds that "[Blueher's teaching] has been systematically inculcated by the Nazi Press, especially Himmler's official organ, Das Schwarze Korps, and has been adopted in practice as the basis of German social organization. The Nazi élite are being brought up in segregated male communities calledOrdensburgen. These are to replace the family as the groundwork on which the state is to rest" (Igra:87).
Who today in America are the "Apostles of Social Reform?" Aren't they the very militants and agitators who just have forced the BSA leadership to cry "Uncle?" Aren't their tactics of bullying and suppression of dissent the very epitome of the Nazi Brownshirts? Now that they have gained power over the Boy Scouts (as indeed they have), do we expect them to do anything but inculcate their values into these young men, the cream of America's future leaders?
Sitting here contemplating the ultimate effects of the Boy Scouts decision, I can't help but recall the "satirical" essay by "Michael Swift: Gay Revolutionary" that was published in Gay Community News, Feb. 15-21, 1987 and subsequently entered into The Congressional Record. Although this article claims to be satirical, history has proven it to be a true and chilling picture of the "gay" mind and goals. "Michael Swift" is the Apostle of Social Reform whose vision is coming true before our eyes.
-
We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in your all male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding...We shall conquer the world because warriors inspired by and banded together by homosexual love and honor are invincible as were the ancient Greek soldiers.
Eighteen years after the German scouting movement began, Lord Baden Powell formed the English organization in 1908 that our Boy Scouts is based upon. Powell is often accused by "gays" of having been a homosexual himself, but their evidence is very flimsy and I don't believe they are correct. In fact, I think Lord Powell was successful only because he built his organization on Biblical values. It is only these values that have protected the Boy Scouts of America from following the example of the Wandervogel and from control by people like "Michael Swift." And frankly, it is only the very public restoration of those values that have allowed the Catholic Church to begin to restore confidence in its priests.
Sadly, the Boy Scouts of America has gone the opposite direction and officially voted to abandon Biblical values and must now begin to experience the consequences of its cowardice and stupidity. One consequence should be the complete and immediate withdrawal of all support by all of us who still hold to those values.
Reprinted from Alan Keyes Is Loyal to Liberty.