Kevin Price
Toyota recall raises questions about conflict of interest
By Kevin Price
Recently I had Cody Willard of the Fox Business Network on my program and we discussed the incredible expansion of the federal government for several years and the fact that the end is no where in sight. Willard attributes the problem to the "Republican" and "Democrat" financial machine that pays for an ever expansive government. In addition of leading to questionable priorities, expansive government can also lead to some very serious questions about conflict of interest. He points to the recent recall of automobiles on the behalf of several automobile companies.
Willard noted that, what was historically done for safety reasons (recalls) leads one to think could be done for business reasons. Think about it, if the US owns a company (it is majority owner of GM), recalls could be a very powerful tool to undermine the competition. In recent weeks there has been a huge increase in the number of cars being recalled. More importantly, the government has brought an unusual level of attention to these some what common events.
The big story has been Toyota with recalls covering numerous models. This is a huge blow on a company that has had a reputation of providing great value through reasonable pricing and high quality. Another company that has seen a more limited recall is Toyota's chief competitor, Honda. Than there is Volvo's SUV problem. The list of companies in a recall covers a huge number of makes and models and there appears to be no end in sight.
Willard is not the only one noting the hype behind the recalls in general and Toyota in particular. Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels has spoken out about the subject as well. "Let's recall. Let's fix it — the cars," Daniels said. "If a fine is in order, then fine, but they have gone so far beyond that. It's very very suspicious in view of the government conflict of interest." He goes on to note, "This is why you don't want government in the car business, for instance. There you have a company doing more than others have done with regard to a recall. There were 600 recalls last year alone and they didn't go so hysterical as this," Daniels said. "These congressmen running this committee (investigating the Toyota recall) have their own agenda and it is a discriminating agenda in this case. They didn't do this the last several hundred recalls."
WHTR TV in Indianapolis is now reporting that Daniels is part of "a bipartisan group of other governors around the nation have joined together to send a letter to the Obama administration, complaining about the handling of the Toyota recall investigation... The governor said the letter was written up without influence from Toyota."
Our federal government has very limited and specific powers, when they do not exercise them properly or if they go beyond that role, the impact can be damaging to everyone in the economy. The people who could suffer from a government abusing its recall powers are the consumers who want safe, but affordable, cars.
© Kevin Price
February 18, 2010
Recently I had Cody Willard of the Fox Business Network on my program and we discussed the incredible expansion of the federal government for several years and the fact that the end is no where in sight. Willard attributes the problem to the "Republican" and "Democrat" financial machine that pays for an ever expansive government. In addition of leading to questionable priorities, expansive government can also lead to some very serious questions about conflict of interest. He points to the recent recall of automobiles on the behalf of several automobile companies.
Willard noted that, what was historically done for safety reasons (recalls) leads one to think could be done for business reasons. Think about it, if the US owns a company (it is majority owner of GM), recalls could be a very powerful tool to undermine the competition. In recent weeks there has been a huge increase in the number of cars being recalled. More importantly, the government has brought an unusual level of attention to these some what common events.
The big story has been Toyota with recalls covering numerous models. This is a huge blow on a company that has had a reputation of providing great value through reasonable pricing and high quality. Another company that has seen a more limited recall is Toyota's chief competitor, Honda. Than there is Volvo's SUV problem. The list of companies in a recall covers a huge number of makes and models and there appears to be no end in sight.
Willard is not the only one noting the hype behind the recalls in general and Toyota in particular. Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels has spoken out about the subject as well. "Let's recall. Let's fix it — the cars," Daniels said. "If a fine is in order, then fine, but they have gone so far beyond that. It's very very suspicious in view of the government conflict of interest." He goes on to note, "This is why you don't want government in the car business, for instance. There you have a company doing more than others have done with regard to a recall. There were 600 recalls last year alone and they didn't go so hysterical as this," Daniels said. "These congressmen running this committee (investigating the Toyota recall) have their own agenda and it is a discriminating agenda in this case. They didn't do this the last several hundred recalls."
WHTR TV in Indianapolis is now reporting that Daniels is part of "a bipartisan group of other governors around the nation have joined together to send a letter to the Obama administration, complaining about the handling of the Toyota recall investigation... The governor said the letter was written up without influence from Toyota."
Our federal government has very limited and specific powers, when they do not exercise them properly or if they go beyond that role, the impact can be damaging to everyone in the economy. The people who could suffer from a government abusing its recall powers are the consumers who want safe, but affordable, cars.
© Kevin Price
The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)
