Peter Lemiska
The imperial presidency, 2014
FacebookTwitter
By Peter Lemiska
January 27, 2014

In recent days, Barack Obama has re-issued his now-familiar threat to Congress, "We're not just going to be waiting for legislation in order to make sure that we're providing Americans the kind of help they need. I've got a pen..." He vowed to use that pen to sign executive orders, bypassing congressional opposition to his agenda. As a crafty politician, he's learned to mask his arrogance with the cloak of compassion and nobility, and has convinced supporters that Congress is an impediment to the help that only he can provide.

So while some accept Obama's unlawful decrees as a necessary evil, others, those who benefit from his largess, don't really care whether they are legal or not. By rationalizing and embracing his unconstitutional short cuts, they all empower him and encourage more of the same. They don't understand that when a benevolent ruler acquires the power of a dictator, benevolence, like political opposition, invariably becomes just another nuisance.

But Obama's abuses extend well beyond his unbridled use of executive orders. There are the scandals, from Solyndra to Fast and Furious, to Benghazi. There is the misuse of government agencies, particularly the IRS, to punish political opposition. There is his disregard for the laws he opposes, and arbitrary adjustments of those he favors. There are the unabashed, self-serving lies, most notably those about Benghazi and Obamacare. And there is so much more.

"The Imperial Presidency" was written about another President who abused his authority 40 years ago. He had many accomplishments, but he also had a distorted perspective on presidential power, which he later revealed in a candid interview: "When the President does it, that means that it is not illegal." Obama seems to share those sentiments of Richard Nixon, who was forced to resign under public pressure and the likelihood of impeachment,

Though he says the right words, Obama has never demonstrated compassion or nobility, but rather a thirst for power and control. Throughout his presidency, he has been protected by the Democratic majority in Congress, his tag team of political appointees, and a doting press. Consequently, he's acquired a sense of political invincibility. As he brazenly and progressively violates his oath of office, we slip further away from the constitutional principles that made our country great.

For now, the opposition is virtually powerless to contain an administration it routinely condemns as lawless and unconstitutional. Republican hearings, like their public outcries, lead nowhere – stonewalled by Obama's political appointees or derailed by his executive orders or Democratic lawmakers.

And where are the honest Democrats? In the wake of the health care debacle, that term has become an oxymoron. Using underhanded tactics and outright deception, they all united with the President to produce the Obamacare fiasco. But even in the face of an outraged electorate, they remain loyal to Obama and the party. In fact, by again invoking the process of reconciliation, they have made it easier to confirm Obama's hand-picked appointees, fortifying his ring of defense.

As Obama settles in to his dictatorial role, the country's patience is wearing thin. Influential citizens, including columnists, authors, legal experts, and lawmakers, are now hinting at impeachment. Obama's fiercest critics are demanding nothing less. Late last year, in a 10 count indictment, the National Black Republican Association publicly called for his impeachment. While Democrats dismiss it as partisanship, the NBRA is not alone. Many public figures, including senior military veterans are making the same demands. Their outrage is especially understandable. They served their country faithfully, and took a solemn oath to protect and defend the Constitution – not some political machine run amok. Those congressional Democrats took the same oath, but seem to have those priorities reversed.

The disapproval of Obama's presidency even crosses the generation gap. According to a recent Harvard poll, 52 percent of 18 to 24 year olds would support a "recall" of the President.

But the grassroots organizations may ultimately have the greatest impact. Like the Tea Party that formed in response to unchecked government spending, groups like Patriots for America are springing up across the country. Their numbers are small now, but they are growing, and their goal is the resignation or impeachment of Obama and his enablers, and a return to the checks and balances of our Constitutional Republic. Through organized events, like the one scheduled in Washington in May, they intend to exert the same kind of pressure that brought Nixon down.

Predictably, the press ignores them while the left nervously mocks them, or dismisses them as racist malcontents. But they are neither. They are a cross-section of America, motivated by patriotism. They have not undertaken their mission because they're unhappy with the last two elections, but because Obama seems to view deception as a legitimate tool of government. They are not calling for his removal because of the color of his skin. They're doing it because of his flagrant disregard for our Constitution. They cannot be mocked or criticized if they adhere to the principles of that document.

While the subject of impeachment is taboo in the media, that won't make it go away. This movement is real. Where it will lead is anyone's guess, but once before, the public was instrumental in unseating an incumbent President. To paraphrase Obama's words, if Congress will not respond to an imperial President, the people will.

© Peter Lemiska

 

The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)

Click to enlarge

Peter Lemiska

Peter Lemiska served in the U.S. Air Force and the U.S. Secret Service. Following his retirement from the Secret Service, he spent several years as a volunteer for the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. Like most of his contemporaries, he's always loved his country, and is deeply dismayed by the new and insidious anti-American sentiment threatening to destroy it. He's a life-long conservative, and his opinion pieces have been published in various print media and on numerous internet sites.

Subscribe

Receive future articles by Peter Lemiska: Click here

More by this author

 

Stephen Stone
HAPPY EASTER: A message to all who love our country and want to help save it

Stephen Stone
The most egregious lies Evan McMullin and the media have told about Sen. Mike Lee

Siena Hoefling
Protect the Children: Update with VIDEO

Stephen Stone
FLASHBACK to 2020: Dems' fake claim that Trump and Utah congressional hopeful Burgess Owens want 'renewed nuclear testing' blows up when examined

Cliff Kincaid
They want to kill Elon Musk

Jerry Newcombe
Four presidents on the wonder of Christmas

Pete Riehm
Biblical masculinity versus toxic masculinity

Tom DeWeese
American Policy Center promises support for anti-UN legislation

Joan Swirsky
Yep…still the smartest guy in the room

Michael Bresciani
How does Trump fit into last days prophecies?

Curtis Dahlgren
George Washington walks into a bar

Matt C. Abbott
Two pro-life stalwarts have passed on

Victor Sharpe
Any Israeli alliances should include the restoration of a just, moral, and enduring pact with the Kurdish people

Linda Kimball
Man as God: The primordial heresy and the evolutionary science of becoming God

Sylvia Thompson
Should the Village People be a part of Trump's Inauguration Ceremony? No—but I suspect they will be

Jerry Newcombe
Reflections on the Good Samaritan ethic
  More columns

Cartoons


Click for full cartoon
More cartoons

Columnists

Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Russ J. Alan
Bonnie Alba
Chuck Baldwin
Kevin J. Banet
J. Matt Barber
Fr. Tom Bartolomeo
. . .
[See more]

Sister sites