Michael Gaynor
President Trump, please turn the tables on Special Counsel Mueller by challenging him to subpoena you instead of letting him interview you
FacebookTwitter
By Michael Gaynor
May 7, 2018

If Special Counsel Mueller subpoenas President Trump to appear before a grand jury, President Trump will have the subpoena quashed and Special Counsel Mueller will belong on trial for malfeasance in office for issuing it.

It's time for President Donald J. Trump to turn the tables on Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

If Special Counsel Mueller subpoenas President Trump to appear before a grand jury, President Trump will have it quashed and Special Counsel Mueller will belong on trial for malfeasance in office for issuing it.

Upon the obvious advice of competent counsel, President Trump should decline to be interviewed by Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

Expecting the Special Counsel and his team to be fair would be foolhardy.

Mueller apparently was appointed Special Counsel although was no underlying crime and he's pursued an alleged crime by foreign National Security Adviser Michael Flynn that allegedly after his appointment – a "lie" to FBI agents that the agents did not detect but Flynn pleaded to as part of a plea bargain reportedly to protect his son.

To date former Trump Presidential Campaign Manager Paul Manafort has refused to plea bargain and instead has challenged Special Counsel Mueller's authority to pursue him on matters long predating the 2016 United States presidential campaign and apparently not connected to it.

To date Special Counsel Mueller has not disclosed his claimed authority to prosecute Manafort on those matter, even to a federal judge considering a motion to dismiss, T.S. Ellis III.

That is intolerable.

Not to mention deplorable.

That judge really must determine whether Special Counsel Mueller has standing to prosecute Manafort and his insistence on seeing all documentation on which Special Counsel Mueller is relying is plainly correct.

The first thing a federal judge assigned a case is supposed to do after being assigned a case is to ascertain whether there is standing.

Special Counsel Mueller reportedly has been pressuring President Trump to submit to interview by suggesting that he might subpoena him to appear before a grand jury if the President does not submit to an interview.

Mr. President, please call that bluff.

Special Counsel Mueller would subject himself to prosecution for malfeasance in office by subpoenaing the President to appear before a grand jury.

Presidents are not to be prosecuted while in office or subpoenaed to appear before a grand jury.

In Daugherty v. Ellis, 142 W. Va. 340, 357-8, 97 S.E.2d 33, 42-3 (W. Va. 1956), the West Virginia Supreme Court stated:

"Malfeasance has been defined by appellate courts in other jurisdictions as a wrongful act which the actor has no legal right to do; as any wrongful conduct which affects, interrupts or interferes with the performance of official duty; as an act for which there is no authority or warrant of law; as an act which a person ought not to do; as an act which is wholly wrongful and unlawful; as that which an officer has no authority to do and is positively wrong or unlawful; and as the unjust performance of some act which the party performing it has no right, or has contracted not, to do."

"Malfeasance in office, or official misconduct, is the commission of an unlawful act, done in an official capacity, which affects the performance of official duties." Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malfeasance_in_office).

The United States Department of Justice has been stating unequivocally since 1973 that a President of the United States cannot be indicted.

There is no exception for Presidents who shock the liberal media and the Deep Swamp by winning.

After quoting from Daugherty, Wikipedia continued as follows:

"The court then went on to use yet another definition, 'malfeasance is the doing of an act which an officer had no legal right to do at all and that when an officer, through ignorance, inattention, or malice, does that which they have no legal right to do at all, or acts without any authority whatsoever, or exceeds, ignores, or abuses their powers, they are guilty of malfeasance.'

"Nevertheless, a few 'elements' can be distilled from those cases. First, malfeasance in office requires an affirmative act or omission. Second, the act must have been done in an official capacity – under the color of office. Finally, that that act somehow interferes with the performance of official duties – though some debate remains about 'whose official' duties.

"In addition, jurisdictions differ greatly over whether intent or knowledge is necessary. As noted above, many courts will find malfeasance in office where there is 'ignorance, inattention, or malice,' which implies no intent or knowledge is required."

If Special Counsel Mueller subpoenas President Trump to appear before a grand jury, President Trump will have it quashed and Special Counsel Mueller will belong on trial for malfeasance in office for issuing it.

© Michael Gaynor

 

The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)

Click to enlarge

Michael Gaynor

Michael J. Gaynor has been practicing law in New York since 1973. A former partner at Fulton, Duncombe & Rowe and Gaynor & Bass, he is a solo practitioner admitted to practice in New York state and federal courts and an Association of the Bar of the City of New York member... (more)

Subscribe

Receive future articles by Michael Gaynor: Click here

More by this author

August 7, 2023
Elections can be 'stolen' in many ways, and the 2020 U.S. presidential election is a 'perfect' example


April 11, 2023
'Politics ain't beanbag,' but investigation and prosecution of Donald Trump by rabid partisans must stop


January 16, 2023
Perhaps learning why the Pearl Harbor attack was a surprise in Hawaii but not in Washington can help us appreciate and learn from other federal government mistakes and move forward wisely


November 4, 2022
Free True the Vote's Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips


October 3, 2022
Who Sabotaged the Nord Stream pipelines?


August 13, 2022
Mar-a-Lago raid shows Trump derangement syndrome has fortuitously worsened


July 5, 2022
From the Warren Court to Roberts Court to Thomas Court


May 21, 2022
Speaker Nancy Pelosi has been barred from receiving Holy Communion at last


November 19, 2021
Justice ultimately prevailed in the Kyle Rittenhouse case


September 1, 2021
Is Afghanistan President Biden's Waterloo, or America's, too?


More articles

 

Stephen Stone
The most egregious lies Evan McMullin and the media have told about Sen. Mike Lee

Siena Hoefling
Protect the Children: Update with VIDEO

Stephen Stone
Flashback: Dems' fake claim that Trump and Utah congressional hopeful Burgess Owens want 'renewed nuclear testing' blows up when examined

Cliff Kincaid
De-Nazification and de-communization in Russia

Marsha West
When Christians tolerate anything and everybody, you cannot guard the flock against wolves

Selwyn Duke
Medical examiner’s office source: “Only 1 to 2%” of “COVID deaths” were really COVID

Michael Bresciani
Canadians stand up for their children – When will America stand?

James Lambert
Why illegal immigration negatively affects our country

Rev. Mark H. Creech
Revelation Chapter 16: A world shaken and pummeled to the ground

Victor Sharpe
November 2, 1956: A day and a month that changed the world

Jerry Newcombe
Communist goals and America

Madeline Crabb
The importance of dress codes and standards

Curtis Dahlgren
'Inside American Education;' beware professional liars

Cherie Zaslawsky
The firebombing of Maui: Part Two

Cherie Zaslawsky
The firebombing of Maui: Part One
  More columns

Cartoons


Click for full cartoon
More cartoons

Columnists

Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Russ J. Alan
Bonnie Alba
Chuck Baldwin
Kevin J. Banet
J. Matt Barber
Fr. Tom Bartolomeo
. . .
[See more]

Sister sites