Bryan Fischer
Founders' Constitution key to stopping statues of Satan
By Bryan Fischer
July 27, 2015

Follow me on Twitter: @BryanJFischer, on Facebook at "Focal Point"

Host of "Focal Point" on AFR Talk, 1-3pm CT, M-F

Seven hundred worshippers of the prince of darkness gathered Saturday night in Detroit to unveil a 9-foot, 2000-pound bronze statue of Satan. "Dark punk" bands played on stage underneath a lighted, upside-down crucifix.

Organizers are now hunting for a permanent home for this goat-headed occult idol named Baphomet, and are shooting right now for the Arkansas state capitol, where they hope to set it up right next to a monument of the Ten Commandments.

Their argument is quite simple: the First Amendment guarantees freedom of religion, so if you allow a Christian symbol you must allow a satanic one, on the grounds of fairness and multiculturalism and diversity and all.

Acolytes will unveil more and more of these statues, and aim to put them on government grounds and in government buildings. If this process is not stopped, Satan-worship will be enshrined in the halls of government from sea to shining sea.

How can this be stopped? Well, we can't do it with the Constitution as it has been mangled by the courts. But the Constitution given to us by the Founders can stop this demonic process in its tracks.

The Constitution is like the Bible. It either means what its authors intended it to mean, or it can mean anything the fevered imaginations of activist judges can dream up.

Judges routinely undermine the plain meaning of the Constitution and use linguistic sleight of hand to conceal their subterfuge. For instance, they substitute the word "expression" for "speech," and voila, pornography magically receives entirely bogus constitutional protection.

Courts have done the same with the word "religion." That word, as found in the First Amendment, either means what the Founders intended it to mean or it can mean anything.

When the Founders used the word "religion," they were referring to the various denominations of Christianity. The population of the United States at the time of the founding was 99.8% Christian and 0.2% Jewish. There were simply no other religious traditions for the Founders even to deal with.

As Joseph Story makes clear, in the First Amendment the Founders were dealing exclusively with Christianity. Story was the longest serving associate justice in Supreme Court history, was appointed to the bench by James Madison, the father of the Constitution, and wrote a monumental and authoritative history of the Constitution.

Here's how he describes what the goal of the Founders was in crafting the First Amendment (emphasis mine):

"The real object of the First Amendment was not to countenance, much less to advance Mohammedanism, or Judaism, or infidelity, by prostrating Christianity, but to exclude all rivalry among Christian sects and to prevent any national ecclesiastical establishment which should give to a hierarchy the exclusive patronage of the national government."

The Founders did not either "countenance" or "advance" religious alternatives to Christianity in the First Amendment. They were not even considering Islam or Judaism or Buddhism or Hinduism or atheism. They were dealing exclusively with Christianity and its various denominations.

The purpose of the First Amendment was to prevent Congress from picking one Christian "sect" – we use the word "denomination" today – and make it the established church of the fledgling nation. Then, secondly, the aim of the First Amendment was to prevent Congress from interfering with the free exercise of the Christian religion anywhere in the new nation.

So Satanism was neither affirmed nor rejected under the First Amendment for the simple reason that Satanism, like every other one of the world's alternative religions, was simply not under discussion at all.

So the Constitution, if we are using the one given to us by the Founders and not the one mangled beyond recognition by the courts, provides no cover for satanism.

So who would have authority to decide whether satanic statues find a place in our state capitols? The Founders made that likewise crystal clear. The First Amendment is intended to bind only the actions of "Congress." "Congress shall make no law..." The only entity that is restrained in any way by the First Amendment is Congress and by extension, the entire federal government, including the judiciary.

So whose call would it be? That would be, under the Founders' constitution, a matter for the states.

As Story put it (emphasis mine),

"[T]he whole power over the subject of religion is left exclusively to the State governments, to be acted upon according to their own sense of justice and the State constitutions."

Thus the Founders granted unrestricted authority to regulate religious expression to the states, which is why nine or 10 of them had officially established churches at the time of the founding.

The Founders gave no authority to the central government, including the judiciary, to regulate religious expression at all. The central government is flatly prohibited by the Founders' constitution from interfering with the free exercise of Christianity in any way anywhere in the United States. Religious expression under the Founders' constitution is entirely under the authority of the individual states.

Bottom line: if Arkansas doesn't want a statue of Satan on its capitol grounds, it doesn't have to have one.

(Unless otherwise noted, the opinions expressed are the author's and do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Family Association or American Family Radio.)

© Bryan Fischer


The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)


Stephen Stone
HAPPY EASTER: A message to all who love our country and want to help save it

Stephen Stone
The most egregious lies Evan McMullin and the media have told about Sen. Mike Lee

Siena Hoefling
Protect the Children: Update with VIDEO

Stephen Stone
FLASHBACK to 2020: Dems' fake claim that Trump and Utah congressional hopeful Burgess Owens want 'renewed nuclear testing' blows up when examined

Rev. Mark H. Creech
‘No other gods before me’: Seven false gods of the present age (Part 2)

Tom DeWeese
Is home ownership the American dream or an opportunity for government control?

Jerry Newcombe
A tale of two revolutions

Victor Sharpe
How the light dawned

Cliff Kincaid
The abortion crisis in the Republican Party

Pete Riehm
Will the real con man please stand up?

Bruce Deitrick Price
Socialist/Communist assault on America — A chronology

Cliff Kincaid
The conspiracy to save Joe Biden

Peter Lemiska
The President’s New Clothes (With Apologies to Hans Christian Andersen)

Joan Swirsky
What is wrong with Biden – Jill Biden, that is?

Linda Goudsmit
CHAPTER 26: Pronouns and Publishing

Cherie Zaslawsky
Surprise, surprise: Michelle's running!
  More columns


Click for full cartoon
More cartoons


Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Russ J. Alan
Bonnie Alba
Chuck Baldwin
Kevin J. Banet
J. Matt Barber
Fr. Tom Bartolomeo
. . .
[See more]

Sister sites