Selwyn Duke
When feminists criminalize "sexist" speech
FacebookTwitter
By Selwyn Duke
November 2, 2012

If you want to know what Barack Obama and his fellow travelers have planned for us, you need look only at what their cutting-edge cousins have already implemented overseas. For example, hate-speech laws have long been used in Europe and other parts of the "Western" world to punish people for criticizing Islam and homosexuality. Now feminists are tightening the noose on freedom further with laws prohibiting "sexist" speech. Writes Phyllis Schlafly at The Moral Liberal:
    England, [and] 18 other nations including Germany and France signed an absurd United Nations treaty about Women that requires them to pass new laws making sexist comments a crime and outlawing "psychological violence," which they define broadly to include statements "seriously impairing a person's psychological integrity through coercion or threats." This is sold to the public as part of a phony campaign against domestic violence....
As with hate-speech prohibitions, these laws introduce a level of subjectivity into punishment that's striking. Who will define what constitutes "sexism," "psychological violence," and "seriously impairing a person's psychological integrity through coercion"? Obviously, this will be done by low level judges and bureaucrats on a case-by-case basis — or, perhaps I should say, on either a male or female basis.

Such laws give government the latitude to punish people selectively based on whether they or their words are in political favor. After all, women are the more talkative sex, with studies showing that they speak an average of 7000 words a day to men's 2000, and they certainly are at least men's equals in cutting with the tongue. Yet, in the same way that hate-speech laws are used as a hammer against Christians but not Muslims, how many "sexism" charges do you think will be brought against women? Will these laws be used to suppress sentiments such as "Boys are stupid. Throw rocks at them" or products such as the "All Men are Bastards" knife block? It's more likely that they'll be trotted out to, among other things, suppress criticism of abortion under the pretext that it impairs the "psychological integrity" of women who have had or are contemplating abortions.

These laws prohibiting "sexist" speech serve further notice that the nanny state has devolved into the Harridan State, as it has now issued a loud "Quiet, dear!" to all who dare utter words — in the home, the halls of government, and the wider society — that displease the feminists. The only bright side is that once you're convicted of "sexist" speech, the government harridan will at least let you finish your sentence.

© Selwyn Duke

 

The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)

Click to enlarge

Selwyn Duke

Selwyn Duke (@SelwynDuke) has written for The Hill, Observer, The American Conservative, WorldNetDaily, and American Thinker. He has also contributed to college textbooks published by Gale – Cengage Learning, has appeared on television and is a frequent guest on radio. His website is www.SelwynDuke.com.

Contact Selwyn Duke, follow him on Twitter, or log on to SelwynDuke.com

Subscribe

Receive future articles by Selwyn Duke: Click here

More by this author

February 3, 2026
Here’s the Truth—and it’s Not Pretti


January 29, 2026
The Democrats WILL support immigration control—at this precise point


December 29, 2025
'Battle of the Sexes' another blow against feminism and 'transgender' lunacy


December 23, 2025
Should we be defending left-wing Europe from right-wing Russia?


December 11, 2025
Citizenship Clause surreality: The Clause’s own author said it doesn’t include aliens


December 3, 2025
NY Times op-ed writer slams Whites: 'You lost;' 'Your culture sucks'


November 25, 2025
'Pride' Flag Flies (in Victory?) Over Now-purplish ex-Catholic Church in Small-town USA


November 6, 2025
Almost a Republican sweep last night—if only men voted


November 3, 2025
Beyond the cotton field: How “racist” was pre-civil-rights-era America, really?


October 23, 2025
Video: Leftist lunacy—my experiences at a Saturday 'No Kings' protest


More articles

 

Stephen Stone
This holiday season: A message to all who love our country and want to help save it

Stephen Stone
The most egregious lies Evan McMullin and the media have told about Sen. Mike Lee

Siena Hoefling
Protect the Children: Update with VIDEO

Stephen Stone
FLASHBACK to 2020: Dems' fake claim that Trump and Utah congressional hopeful Burgess Owens want 'renewed nuclear testing' blows up when examined

Tom DeWeese
Stop the Chemtrail Destruction: Here’s a bill every legislator needs to support

Steve A. Stone
An explanation – in case you need one

Curtis Dahlgren
Get a load of this, Meathead: Actual quotes by college professors

Jerry Newcombe
Is it cool to be unpatriotic? Perhaps—but it’s also ungrateful

Pete Riehm
Buffet or melting pot?

Linda Goudsmit
An open letter to President Trump

Joan Swirsky
A leftist anti-ICE fantasy

Cliff Kincaid
A scandal bigger than Epstein [VIDEO]

Tom DeWeese
The hidden war on property rights — How NGOs pressure your local officials [VIDEO]

Rev. Mark H. Creech
Truth for Our Times: A Weekly Commentary on Faith, Culture, and the Public Square

Paul Cameron
Women can’t be replaced – Are they revolting against pregnancy?

Curtis Dahlgren
Thoughts on one-child Presidents: coincidental results?
  More columns

Cartoons


Click for full cartoon
More cartoons

Columnists

Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Russ J. Alan
Bonnie Alba
Chuck Baldwin
Kevin J. Banet
J. Matt Barber
Fr. Tom Bartolomeo
. . .
[See more]

Sister sites