Tom DeWeese
The threat to freedom: The Southern Poverty Law Center and the Department of Homeland Security
By Tom DeWeese
Author's Note: Last year, Dr. Ben Carson upset Barrack Obama by speaking out against Obamacare during a public meeting in which Obama was also present. It caused shock waves and immediately catapulted Dr. Carson into the public eye, and many now promote him as a possible presidential candidate in 2016. Yet, for this act, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has now placed Dr. Carson on its "extremist" watch file. That's what every American is faced with if they dare speak out against the radical Progressive agenda.
A while back, I was asked to address the Congressional Tea Party Caucus on Capital Hill concerning the threat to Conservatives by the Southern Poverty law Center. This past year, the SPLC issued yet another attack against me and those fighting Agenda 21, calling us a radical fringe element. And still, the SPLC has its contracts with the Department of Homeland Security. That's why I believe the SPLC is a danger to freedom and why I'm renewing my call for the new Republican led congress to seriously investigate this dangerous anti-free speech hate group. Here was my testimony. TD
Briefing to the Tea Party Caucus of the U.S. House of Representatives
By Tom DeWeese
My name is Tom DeWeese, President of the American Policy Center, and according to the Southern Poverty Law Center I am a right wing extremist, a racist, and a potentially violent terrorist.
In March, 2010, SPLC issued a report entitled "Rage on the Right: The Year in Hate and Extremism," in which groups opposed to issues like the Obama health care plan and illegal immigration were lumped with white supremacist groups like the National Socialist Movement and Skin Heads.
In August, 2010, SPLC launched an attack against my organization and our national conference, the Freedom Action Conference, held at Valley Forge, PA, and featuring such speakers as best selling author Tom Woods, former presidential candidate Michael Badnarik, Sheriff Richard Mack, several respected state legislators, and many more well-known spokesmen.
The title of the SPLC attack against me read, "Patriot Rhetoric Becomes Increasingly Violent," and said we were "united by rage" at the federal government. Not one speaker at our conference advocated violence or lawlessness of any kind. Yet we were labeled as dangerous and potentially violent terrorists.
Annually, SPLC puts out a list of what it calls "hate" groups and individuals it deems dangerous to the nation. That list is almost exclusively respected pro-Constitution spokesmen.
Now why do I care what this private organization, with its own political agenda, says about me?
Because the Southern Poverty Law Center has direct ties to the Department of Homeland Security, helping to write official DHS policy that may affect my life, my freedom, my ability to travel, and my ability to speak out.
Consider the following facts:
Item: In 2009, The DHS issued a report entitled "Right-wing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment."
That official document of an agency of the United States government said "Right-wing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly anti-government, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration."
Item: Two weeks later, the DHS released a second report entitled "Domestic Extremism Lexicon," designed to provide specific definitions of just who may be right wing extremists.
That report labeled the following to be extremists, bordering on terrorism: those concerned over the economy, loss of jobs, foreclosures; antagonistic toward the Obama Administration; critical of free trade programs; anti-abortion; opposed to same-sex marriage; believing in the "end times;" stockpiling food; opposed to illegal immigration; opposed to a New World Order; opposed to the UN; opposed to global governance; afraid of Communist regimes; opposed to loss of U.S. manufacturing to overseas nations; opposed to loss of U.S. prestige; and using the internet (or alternative media) to express any of these ideas.
Right after both of these reports were issued, there was the shooting at the Holocaust Museum. Next to their news reports on the incident, many newspapers carried side bar articles citing the DHS reports, basically confirming that such violence is perpetrated by right wing nuts and justifying the concerns of the DHS – just like clockwork.
Yet there was absolutely no connection found between that shooter and the right wing. But the damage was done.
And there's more.
The Department of Homeland Security has established Fusion Centers in each state. These are designed to combine federal, state, and local law enforcement. Their stated purpose is to assure immediate and efficient response to a terrorist attack or a Katrina-like disaster without bureaucratic red tape.
Item: In 2009, the Missouri Fusion Center set off a firestorm over a report it issued entitled "The Modern Militia Movement." Reported Fox News, the report "identifies the warning signs of potential terrorists for law enforcement communities."
In other words, this report was issued to law enforcement agencies across the state as official documentation warning who the cops should look out for as potential violent terrorists.
The list of potential terrorists included Americans who voted for presidential candidate Ron Paul; Constitution Party presidential candidate Chuck Baldwin; and Libertarian Party presidential candidate Bob Barr. It also cited those of us who opposed the creation of a North American Union with Canada and Mexico.
Item: In January, 2011, immediately following the shooting of Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, the Arizona Fusion Center issued a report saying that the shooter was influenced by a right wing group called American Renaissance.
Immediately, the mainstream media picked up the report and flooded the airways with the story that the radical and violent right wing was responsible for the shootings.
The information was completely wrong. There is no evidence that there was ever any connection between the shooter and American Renaissance. Moreover, American Renaissance has never advocated violence or extremism. The only connection between American Renaissance and extremism is that the Southern Poverty Law Center listed them as a hate group. A detail that interestingly found its way into the Arizona Fusion Center report as fact.
Item: in the Spring of 2010, the Department of Homeland Security organized a "Countering Violent Extremism Working Group." This is an advisory council given the task of creating a plan to reach out to local law enforcement and community activists for training to respond to potential violence and terrorist threat.
Leafing through the report, one gets the distinct impression that the plan is basically a "turn in your neighbor" neighborhood-watch approach. It talks extensively of "sharing" information, along with "training, training, training."
Training for what? To identify potential terrorists, of course. And who are those potential terrorists? A look at the members of the "working group" offers a clue.
While the group includes several public officials and law enforcement officials from around the nation, and it also includes Mohamed Magid, president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), an unindicted co-conspirator in a case concerning the funding of Muslim terrorist organizations.
And the working group member list also includes Richard Cohen, President of the Southern Poverty Law Center.
In addition, as one of the "Subject Matter Experts," it lists Laurie Wood, an analyst for the Southern Poverty Law Center and an instructor for the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center.
That training center is run by the Southern Poverty Law Center and is one of the most visible direct links between DHS, the Fusion Centers, and SPLC. Law enforcement agencies actually send their personnel to these training classes to gain Federal Law Enforcement Training Center certification.
That means that policy for this DHS working group is being created by the very organization that has labeled those who advocate constitutional law to be potential terrorists.
In addition, the "training" called for in the report will most likely be conducted, at least in part, by the SPLC's Federal Law Enforcement Training Center.
The pattern is clear, one of the nation's leading hate groups, the Southern Poverty Law Center, which opposes even the right of free speech by people it labels potential terrorists, is helping the largest federal enforcement agency in the nation to create its policy.
That policy clearly states, according to DHS reports, that anyone disagreeing with actions of the American government is a potential terrorist and must be at least watched and monitored by federal, state, and local authorities.
The result of such surveillance could possibly lead to loss of freedom, loss of jobs, loss of the ability to travel, and loss of the ability to speak publicly for anyone who opposes the private agenda of the Southern Poverty Law Center.
It is an effort to silence their opponents. Honest political debate is now being interpreted as dangerous extremism.
Why is DHS dealing with such people? Are the policies of SPLC the same policies as the United States? If so, then freedom in America is in grave danger, indeed.
I believe there needs to be an immediate Congressional investigation into the ties between the Department of Homeland Security and the Southern Poverty Law Center and any other radical groups.
Particular attention should be paid to SPLC's tax exempt status and the amount of money it receives from DHS or any other agency. And there should be an immediate stop to American law enforcement being trained by SPLC's Federal Law Enforcement Training Center.
The specific purpose of the Department of Homeland Security is to protect the "STATE" against all enemies. That has come to include anyone who uses their First Amendment right to speak out against specific federal policies.
Apparently, that has been interpreted by DHS to mean a threat to the STATE.
May I remind you that the tanks that ran over the student protesters in Tiananmen Square in Communist China were also protecting the STATE against its enemies.
I fear that if private groups with their own political agendas, like the SPLC, are allowed to continue feeding their own brand of hatred into the policies of DHS, then such a comparison with China is not too far off. I don't think that is the America each of you pledged to serve.
© Tom DeWeese
February 12, 2015
Author's Note: Last year, Dr. Ben Carson upset Barrack Obama by speaking out against Obamacare during a public meeting in which Obama was also present. It caused shock waves and immediately catapulted Dr. Carson into the public eye, and many now promote him as a possible presidential candidate in 2016. Yet, for this act, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has now placed Dr. Carson on its "extremist" watch file. That's what every American is faced with if they dare speak out against the radical Progressive agenda.
A while back, I was asked to address the Congressional Tea Party Caucus on Capital Hill concerning the threat to Conservatives by the Southern Poverty law Center. This past year, the SPLC issued yet another attack against me and those fighting Agenda 21, calling us a radical fringe element. And still, the SPLC has its contracts with the Department of Homeland Security. That's why I believe the SPLC is a danger to freedom and why I'm renewing my call for the new Republican led congress to seriously investigate this dangerous anti-free speech hate group. Here was my testimony. TD
Briefing to the Tea Party Caucus of the U.S. House of Representatives
By Tom DeWeese
My name is Tom DeWeese, President of the American Policy Center, and according to the Southern Poverty Law Center I am a right wing extremist, a racist, and a potentially violent terrorist.
In March, 2010, SPLC issued a report entitled "Rage on the Right: The Year in Hate and Extremism," in which groups opposed to issues like the Obama health care plan and illegal immigration were lumped with white supremacist groups like the National Socialist Movement and Skin Heads.
In August, 2010, SPLC launched an attack against my organization and our national conference, the Freedom Action Conference, held at Valley Forge, PA, and featuring such speakers as best selling author Tom Woods, former presidential candidate Michael Badnarik, Sheriff Richard Mack, several respected state legislators, and many more well-known spokesmen.
The title of the SPLC attack against me read, "Patriot Rhetoric Becomes Increasingly Violent," and said we were "united by rage" at the federal government. Not one speaker at our conference advocated violence or lawlessness of any kind. Yet we were labeled as dangerous and potentially violent terrorists.
Annually, SPLC puts out a list of what it calls "hate" groups and individuals it deems dangerous to the nation. That list is almost exclusively respected pro-Constitution spokesmen.
Now why do I care what this private organization, with its own political agenda, says about me?
Because the Southern Poverty Law Center has direct ties to the Department of Homeland Security, helping to write official DHS policy that may affect my life, my freedom, my ability to travel, and my ability to speak out.
Consider the following facts:
Item: In 2009, The DHS issued a report entitled "Right-wing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment."
That official document of an agency of the United States government said "Right-wing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly anti-government, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration."
Item: Two weeks later, the DHS released a second report entitled "Domestic Extremism Lexicon," designed to provide specific definitions of just who may be right wing extremists.
That report labeled the following to be extremists, bordering on terrorism: those concerned over the economy, loss of jobs, foreclosures; antagonistic toward the Obama Administration; critical of free trade programs; anti-abortion; opposed to same-sex marriage; believing in the "end times;" stockpiling food; opposed to illegal immigration; opposed to a New World Order; opposed to the UN; opposed to global governance; afraid of Communist regimes; opposed to loss of U.S. manufacturing to overseas nations; opposed to loss of U.S. prestige; and using the internet (or alternative media) to express any of these ideas.
Right after both of these reports were issued, there was the shooting at the Holocaust Museum. Next to their news reports on the incident, many newspapers carried side bar articles citing the DHS reports, basically confirming that such violence is perpetrated by right wing nuts and justifying the concerns of the DHS – just like clockwork.
Yet there was absolutely no connection found between that shooter and the right wing. But the damage was done.
And there's more.
The Department of Homeland Security has established Fusion Centers in each state. These are designed to combine federal, state, and local law enforcement. Their stated purpose is to assure immediate and efficient response to a terrorist attack or a Katrina-like disaster without bureaucratic red tape.
Item: In 2009, the Missouri Fusion Center set off a firestorm over a report it issued entitled "The Modern Militia Movement." Reported Fox News, the report "identifies the warning signs of potential terrorists for law enforcement communities."
In other words, this report was issued to law enforcement agencies across the state as official documentation warning who the cops should look out for as potential violent terrorists.
The list of potential terrorists included Americans who voted for presidential candidate Ron Paul; Constitution Party presidential candidate Chuck Baldwin; and Libertarian Party presidential candidate Bob Barr. It also cited those of us who opposed the creation of a North American Union with Canada and Mexico.
Item: In January, 2011, immediately following the shooting of Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, the Arizona Fusion Center issued a report saying that the shooter was influenced by a right wing group called American Renaissance.
Immediately, the mainstream media picked up the report and flooded the airways with the story that the radical and violent right wing was responsible for the shootings.
The information was completely wrong. There is no evidence that there was ever any connection between the shooter and American Renaissance. Moreover, American Renaissance has never advocated violence or extremism. The only connection between American Renaissance and extremism is that the Southern Poverty Law Center listed them as a hate group. A detail that interestingly found its way into the Arizona Fusion Center report as fact.
Item: in the Spring of 2010, the Department of Homeland Security organized a "Countering Violent Extremism Working Group." This is an advisory council given the task of creating a plan to reach out to local law enforcement and community activists for training to respond to potential violence and terrorist threat.
Leafing through the report, one gets the distinct impression that the plan is basically a "turn in your neighbor" neighborhood-watch approach. It talks extensively of "sharing" information, along with "training, training, training."
Training for what? To identify potential terrorists, of course. And who are those potential terrorists? A look at the members of the "working group" offers a clue.
While the group includes several public officials and law enforcement officials from around the nation, and it also includes Mohamed Magid, president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), an unindicted co-conspirator in a case concerning the funding of Muslim terrorist organizations.
And the working group member list also includes Richard Cohen, President of the Southern Poverty Law Center.
In addition, as one of the "Subject Matter Experts," it lists Laurie Wood, an analyst for the Southern Poverty Law Center and an instructor for the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center.
That training center is run by the Southern Poverty Law Center and is one of the most visible direct links between DHS, the Fusion Centers, and SPLC. Law enforcement agencies actually send their personnel to these training classes to gain Federal Law Enforcement Training Center certification.
That means that policy for this DHS working group is being created by the very organization that has labeled those who advocate constitutional law to be potential terrorists.
In addition, the "training" called for in the report will most likely be conducted, at least in part, by the SPLC's Federal Law Enforcement Training Center.
The pattern is clear, one of the nation's leading hate groups, the Southern Poverty Law Center, which opposes even the right of free speech by people it labels potential terrorists, is helping the largest federal enforcement agency in the nation to create its policy.
That policy clearly states, according to DHS reports, that anyone disagreeing with actions of the American government is a potential terrorist and must be at least watched and monitored by federal, state, and local authorities.
The result of such surveillance could possibly lead to loss of freedom, loss of jobs, loss of the ability to travel, and loss of the ability to speak publicly for anyone who opposes the private agenda of the Southern Poverty Law Center.
It is an effort to silence their opponents. Honest political debate is now being interpreted as dangerous extremism.
Why is DHS dealing with such people? Are the policies of SPLC the same policies as the United States? If so, then freedom in America is in grave danger, indeed.
I believe there needs to be an immediate Congressional investigation into the ties between the Department of Homeland Security and the Southern Poverty Law Center and any other radical groups.
Particular attention should be paid to SPLC's tax exempt status and the amount of money it receives from DHS or any other agency. And there should be an immediate stop to American law enforcement being trained by SPLC's Federal Law Enforcement Training Center.
The specific purpose of the Department of Homeland Security is to protect the "STATE" against all enemies. That has come to include anyone who uses their First Amendment right to speak out against specific federal policies.
Apparently, that has been interpreted by DHS to mean a threat to the STATE.
May I remind you that the tanks that ran over the student protesters in Tiananmen Square in Communist China were also protecting the STATE against its enemies.
I fear that if private groups with their own political agendas, like the SPLC, are allowed to continue feeding their own brand of hatred into the policies of DHS, then such a comparison with China is not too far off. I don't think that is the America each of you pledged to serve.
© Tom DeWeese
The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)
