
A.J. Castellitto
There is more evidence for the Miracle of JESUS than the miracle of evolution
A.J. Castellitto
Bart Ehrman Refuted:
Claim: The much beloved and revered (by hardened secularists) New Testament "scholar" proudly boasts "there are four hundred thousand textual variants among the ancient New Testament manuscripts"
Clarification: The variants (varying usually slightly from the standard form) he speaks of when making his case for the inconsistency of NT manuscripts (in an attempt to undermine consistent, historical, Biblical truth) is theologically inconsequential and its affect upon the veracity and authority of scripture less than miniscule.
Further Reading: "Ehrman Errant" by Louis Markos http://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2014/10/ehrman-errant
*To get a glimpse of how Ehrman is undaunted by his own willful ignorance (or maybe he needs to find his faith again so he can stop lying)...
http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2008/08/why-bart-ehrman-keeps-losing-debates.html
*To get a glimpse of how confused and convoluted Ehrman can be....
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/5029457
*In case you still believed Ehrman's arguments have any merit...
http://www.alwaysbeready.com/bart-ehrman
http://www.reformation21.org/shelf-life/jesus-interrupted.php
http://www.apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=13&article;=4253
• Richard Dawkins Refuted:
Claim: "Universal DNA Code Is 'Knockdown' Evidence of Evolution"
Clarification: So there's no direct evidence for natural origin, unguided design or accidental progress, yet, the truth of evolution is a slam dunk? Sounds like wishful thinking to me. How is genetic uniformity a blow to intelligent design and the divine handprint of the Creator upon His special creation anyway?
Further Reading: See Below.........
*Examples of cheap shots and ridicule replacing or supplementing the same old, tired and refuted evolutionary talking points used to silence scrutiny and dissent..... Or maybe the genetic patterns in a species remain consistent enough to prove that man was always and will always remain man!
http://www.uncommondescent.com/faq/
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2014/10/surprise_surpri090611.html
*Evolution's Fatal Catch-22: Junk DNA & Neutral Evolution (Haldane's Dilemma)......
http://creation.mobi/junk-dna-slow-death
[ "The creationists are going to love this...Almost every nucleotide ..."? Gimme a break. Don't these guys read the scientific literature? This is going to make my life very complicated. – an exasperated Larry Moran (not a friend of Christian origins) http://sandwalk.blogspot.com/2012/09/encode-leader-says-that-80-of-our.html?m=1 ]
http://www.uncommondescent.com/junk-dna/latest-encode-research-validates-id-predictions-on-non-coding-repertoire/
http://www.apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=9&article;=4670
*An affirmative scientific case for Intelligent Design.....
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2011/03/a_closer_look_at_one_scientist045311.html
*Even 'Theistic Evolutionists' are stymied. Can the critics at least get on the same page? Contradiction is such a thorn in the side of Consensus, especially when offered up so arrogantly......
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2014/11/among_theistic_090921.html
*A Strong Offense/Defense.....
http://www.algemeiner.com/2011/08/17/scientists-prove-again-that-life-is-the-result-of-intelligent-design/
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=submitSearchQuery&orderBy;=date&orderDir;=DESC&query;=Casey%20Luskin&searchBy;=author&searchType;=all&includeBlogPosts;=true
*On Autopoiesis......
http://releasingthetruth.wordpress.com/2013/05/20/autopoiesis-evidence-of-intelligent-design/
*And here's a Comprehensive Classic.....
http://www.trueorigin.org/dawkinfo.asp
And around and around the evolutionary circle we go..... Because true objectivity is too scientific.....
Anyway, Atheism is Dead.....
http://www.science20.com/writer_on_the_edge/blog/scientists_discover_that_atheists_might_not_exist_and_thats_not_a_joke-139982
"And he answered and said unto them, I tell you that, if these should hold their peace, the stones would immediately cry out."
http://godevidence.com/about/
© A.J. Castellitto
By Bart Ehrman Refuted:
Claim: The much beloved and revered (by hardened secularists) New Testament "scholar" proudly boasts "there are four hundred thousand textual variants among the ancient New Testament manuscripts"
Clarification: The variants (varying usually slightly from the standard form) he speaks of when making his case for the inconsistency of NT manuscripts (in an attempt to undermine consistent, historical, Biblical truth) is theologically inconsequential and its affect upon the veracity and authority of scripture less than miniscule.
Further Reading: "Ehrman Errant" by Louis Markos http://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2014/10/ehrman-errant
*To get a glimpse of how Ehrman is undaunted by his own willful ignorance (or maybe he needs to find his faith again so he can stop lying)...
http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2008/08/why-bart-ehrman-keeps-losing-debates.html
*To get a glimpse of how confused and convoluted Ehrman can be....
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/5029457
*In case you still believed Ehrman's arguments have any merit...
http://www.alwaysbeready.com/bart-ehrman
http://www.reformation21.org/shelf-life/jesus-interrupted.php
http://www.apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=13&article;=4253
• Richard Dawkins Refuted:
Claim: "Universal DNA Code Is 'Knockdown' Evidence of Evolution"
Clarification: So there's no direct evidence for natural origin, unguided design or accidental progress, yet, the truth of evolution is a slam dunk? Sounds like wishful thinking to me. How is genetic uniformity a blow to intelligent design and the divine handprint of the Creator upon His special creation anyway?
Further Reading: See Below.........
*Examples of cheap shots and ridicule replacing or supplementing the same old, tired and refuted evolutionary talking points used to silence scrutiny and dissent..... Or maybe the genetic patterns in a species remain consistent enough to prove that man was always and will always remain man!
http://www.uncommondescent.com/faq/
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2014/10/surprise_surpri090611.html
*Evolution's Fatal Catch-22: Junk DNA & Neutral Evolution (Haldane's Dilemma)......
http://creation.mobi/junk-dna-slow-death
[ "The creationists are going to love this...Almost every nucleotide ..."? Gimme a break. Don't these guys read the scientific literature? This is going to make my life very complicated. – an exasperated Larry Moran (not a friend of Christian origins) http://sandwalk.blogspot.com/2012/09/encode-leader-says-that-80-of-our.html?m=1 ]
http://www.uncommondescent.com/junk-dna/latest-encode-research-validates-id-predictions-on-non-coding-repertoire/
http://www.apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=9&article;=4670
*An affirmative scientific case for Intelligent Design.....
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2011/03/a_closer_look_at_one_scientist045311.html
*Even 'Theistic Evolutionists' are stymied. Can the critics at least get on the same page? Contradiction is such a thorn in the side of Consensus, especially when offered up so arrogantly......
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2014/11/among_theistic_090921.html
*A Strong Offense/Defense.....
http://www.algemeiner.com/2011/08/17/scientists-prove-again-that-life-is-the-result-of-intelligent-design/
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=submitSearchQuery&orderBy;=date&orderDir;=DESC&query;=Casey%20Luskin&searchBy;=author&searchType;=all&includeBlogPosts;=true
*On Autopoiesis......
http://releasingthetruth.wordpress.com/2013/05/20/autopoiesis-evidence-of-intelligent-design/
*And here's a Comprehensive Classic.....
http://www.trueorigin.org/dawkinfo.asp
And around and around the evolutionary circle we go..... Because true objectivity is too scientific.....
Anyway, Atheism is Dead.....
http://www.science20.com/writer_on_the_edge/blog/scientists_discover_that_atheists_might_not_exist_and_thats_not_a_joke-139982
"And he answered and said unto them, I tell you that, if these should hold their peace, the stones would immediately cry out."
http://godevidence.com/about/
© A.J. Castellitto
The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)